The First Man in Rome | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of The First Man in Rome.

The First Man in Rome | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of The First Man in Rome.
This section contains 739 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Fred Mench

SOURCE: A review of The First Man in Rome and The Grass Crown, in Classical World, Vol. 86, No. 6, July, 1993, pp. 517-8.

In the following review, Mench commends McCullough's recreation of Roman history in The First Man in Rome and The Grass Crown, recommending both novels as supplementary reading for students of ancient Rome.

Classicists will dispute some details and some unusual interpretations of the dynamics of the period 110 to 86 BC, but most will regret only that there are no footnotes in these two excellent historical novels. McCullough supplies maps (Rome, Italy, and elsewhere), plans (e.g., Aurelia's insula), authentic-looking drawings of major characters, casts of characters, pronunciation guides for Latin names and terms (First Man), a consular list for 99-86 (Grass Crown), author's notes and a glorious glossary in each novel (94 pp. in First Man; 74 pp. in Grass Crown).

The extensive glossaries (with singulars and plurals for most...

(read more)

This section contains 739 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Fred Mench
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Fred Mench from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.