Kamo no Chōmei | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 93 pages of analysis & critique of Kamo no Chōmei.

Kamo no Chōmei | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 93 pages of analysis & critique of Kamo no Chōmei.
This section contains 24,925 words
(approx. 84 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Thomas Blenman Hare

SOURCE: Hare, Thomas Blenman. “Reading Kamo no Chōmei.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 49, no. 1 (1989): 173-228.

In the following essay, Hare discusses Chōmei's writings, noting that scholars disagree on how best to approach his work.

The only extant scrap of Kamo no Chōmei's handwriting is a brief note in kanbun, now in a private collection. The some thirty characters on the page, in grass script in a pleasing but slightly busy hand, must have been written unselfconsciously and with little prior deliberation or aesthetic pretense; the note is simply a receipt for the now unknown borrower of seven bamboo sudare: “Of the seven screens, you had graciously returned five previously. [Now] you have indeed returned the remaining two. Most respectfully signed, this twenty-third day of the first month, Nagaakira.”1 It is probably simply an accident of history that this piece of calligraphy has survived, but there...

(read more)

This section contains 24,925 words
(approx. 84 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Thomas Blenman Hare
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Thomas Blenman Hare from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.