John of Salisbury | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 28 pages of analysis & critique of John of Salisbury.

John of Salisbury | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 28 pages of analysis & critique of John of Salisbury.
This section contains 7,613 words
(approx. 26 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Cary J. Nederman

SOURCE: Nederman, Cary J. “Aristotelian Ethics and John of Salisbury's Letters.” Viator: Medieval and Renaissance Studies 18 (1987): 161-73.

In the following essay, Nederman traces the influence of Aristotle's ideas in John's letters and suggests that their presence indicates a consistency in principle, in both practical and philosophical application.

To philosophers and political theorists, John of Salisbury represents the pinnacle of twelfth-century learning, his Policraticus and Metalogicon reflecting the breadth and depth of medieval intellectual accomplishment.1 To political and ecclesiastical historians, John is primarily valuable for the observations about great events and important men reported in his extant correspondence and chronicles.2 Of course, this somewhat schizophrenic image of John's work is overshadowed by his more general reputation as the Latin humanist and man of letters preeminent in his age—equally comfortable as administrator, secretary, legal advisor, politician, and schoolman.3 But it is nevertheless the case that little effort has been...

(read more)

This section contains 7,613 words
(approx. 26 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Cary J. Nederman
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Cary J. Nederman from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.