The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 21 pages of analysis & critique of The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner.

The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 21 pages of analysis & critique of The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner.
This section contains 5,928 words
(approx. 20 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by David Oakleaf

SOURCE: Oakleaf, David. “‘Not the Truth’: The Doubleness of Hogg's Confessions and the Eighteenth-Century Tradition.” Studies in Scottish Literature 18 (1983): 59-74.

In the following essay, Oakleaf analyzes the double narrative of The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner in terms of eighteenth-century conceptions of empirical and subjective experience and of the sublime and the beautiful.

The double perspective of Editor and Justified Sinner is the central critical problem in Hogg's Confessions [The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner]. Certainly the two versions of the story are not in complete agreement and the ambiguity is related to the ambiguous relationships between Robert and his doubles, George and Gil-Martin. These ambiguities have obvious connections to contemporary Romantic fiction and poetry, so that it is all the more suggestive that the Confessions presents a logical extreme development of the dominant philosophical tradition of the eighteenth century. The Editor's...

(read more)

This section contains 5,928 words
(approx. 20 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by David Oakleaf
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by David Oakleaf from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.