King Henry VI, Part 1 | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 16 pages of analysis & critique of King Henry VI, Part 1.

King Henry VI, Part 1 | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 16 pages of analysis & critique of King Henry VI, Part 1.
This section contains 4,276 words
(approx. 15 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by John D. Cox and Eric Rasmussen

SOURCE: Cox, John D., and Eric Rasmussen. Introduction to King Henry VI Part 3, by William Shakespeare, edited by John D. Cox and Eric Rasmussen, pp. 1-176. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2001.

In the following excerpt, Cox and Rasmussen review the characters of Henry and Richard. They note that there is an ongoing debate among critics regarding whether King Henry is a symbol of saintliness or ineptitude; however, they find that most critics agree that Richard's character is evil.

Henry

Of the two characters who have been most discussed in 3 Henry VI, Henry has been regarded least consistently. To some interpreters, he has appeared to be a good man in a bad situation, capable of doing no wrong himself but destroyed by the wrongs of others. ‘This gentle, bewildered soul makes the only human remarks in [2 Henry VI]’, John Masefield observed. ‘In Shakespeare's vision it is from such souls, planted, to...

(read more)

This section contains 4,276 words
(approx. 15 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by John D. Cox and Eric Rasmussen
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by John D. Cox and Eric Rasmussen from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.