Rainer Werner Fassbinder | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of Rainer Werner Fassbinder.

Rainer Werner Fassbinder | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of Rainer Werner Fassbinder.
This section contains 426 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Raymond Durgnat

We're tempted to say that Fassbinder is a better playwright than film director. But we can't quite convince ourselves that he began with some acute sense of how human beings oppress and twist one another and themselves, and that he lost it on film through believing that Douglas Sirk … was a Marxist pioneer of alienation effect by exaggeration. We see these movies as soft-edge, soft-core, bourgeois self-criticism….

On all his actors Fassbinder's carefully formalized visuals impose a strange style which certainly hits the jackpot of a fashionable aesthetic. Following an almost mechanical alternation of passion and blankness (limp deadpan, tears, limp deadpan), Fassbinder succeeds only too well in transforming illusionistic acting into a series of arbitrary signs half-disembedded from any illusionistic continuum. Presumably intended as an alienation effect, it prompts the reflection that if so much has to be added to the dramatic plane, then that dramatic plane...

(read more)

This section contains 426 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Raymond Durgnat
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Raymond Durgnat from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.