Omeros | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 16 pages of analysis & critique of Omeros.

Omeros | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 16 pages of analysis & critique of Omeros.
This section contains 2,775 words
(approx. 10 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Nicholas Everett

SOURCE: Everett, Nicholas. “Paradise Lost.” London Review of Books (11 July 1991): 22–23.

In the following excerpt, Everett compliments the “rich texture” of the verse in Omeros.

During the 18th and 19th centuries verse surrendered its longer discursive and narrative forms to prose and confined itself more and more to the short lyric and the sequence of short lyrics. Much of this century's verse appears to be continuing the process by avoiding paraphrasable meaning altogether. One need only point to the work of Wallace Stevens or John Ashbery to show how successfully some of its sustains our expectations while ultimately refusing to deliver the semantic goods. Having extracted a poem's point, runs the usual defence of such teasing evasions, readers will have no further use for the poem itself: indeterminacy thus insures a poem against prompt expiry and may even keep it enduringly fresh. Furthermore, if a poem can be paraphrased...

(read more)

This section contains 2,775 words
(approx. 10 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Nicholas Everett
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Nicholas Everett from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.