Christina Hoff Sommers | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 8 pages of analysis & critique of Christina Hoff Sommers.

Christina Hoff Sommers | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 8 pages of analysis & critique of Christina Hoff Sommers.
This section contains 1,986 words
(approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Tama Starr

SOURCE: Starr, Tama. “Reactionary Feminism.” Reason 26, no. 5 (October 1994): 62-6.

In the following review, Starr notes that Who Stole Feminism? is an entertaining, informative, and well-researched book, but comments that Sommers fails to place her subject matter in a broader political context.

Ten years late, but we're nearly there. War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. “Objective reality” is an invidious myth employed by evil oppressors (men) to maintain their phallohegemonic dominance. Big Sister Is Watching for instances of heteropatriarchal discourse, and punishment is swift and severe. A futuristic nightmare? No, the all-too-real world of your high school, university, newsroom, and administrative agency—and coming soon to a workplace near you.

In Who Stole Feminism?: How Women Have Betrayed Women, Christina Hoff Sommers, associate professor of philosophy at Clark University, describes the appropriation of the movement once known as feminism by a cadre of party-line bureaucrats promoting an agenda of...

(read more)

This section contains 1,986 words
(approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Tama Starr
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Tama Starr from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.