The Canterbury Tales | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 15 pages of analysis & critique of The Canterbury Tales.

The Canterbury Tales | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 15 pages of analysis & critique of The Canterbury Tales.
This section contains 4,159 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by E. Talbot Donaldson

SOURCE: "Chaucer The Pilgrim," in PMLA, Vol. LXIX, No. 4, September, 1954, pp. 928-36.

Donaldson is a scholar of Medieval and Old English Literature known for his translation of Beowulf for modern readers and his book, Speaking of Chaucer. In the following excerpt, Donaldson analyzes the persona of the fictional Chaucer, the narrator of the Canterbury Tales, and discusses the differences and similarities between this fictional protagonist and the poem's actual author.

Verisimilitude in a work of fiction is not without its attendant dangers, the chief of which is that the responses it stimulates in the reader may be those appropriate not so much to an imaginative production as to an historical one or to a piece of reporting. History and reporting are, of course, honorable in themselves, but if we react to a poet as though he were an historian or a reporter, we do him somewhat less than...

(read more)

This section contains 4,159 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by E. Talbot Donaldson
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by E. Talbot Donaldson from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.