John Barbour | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 29 pages of analysis & critique of John Barbour.

John Barbour | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 29 pages of analysis & critique of John Barbour.
This section contains 8,539 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Matthew P. McDiarmid and James A. C. Stevenson

SOURCE: "Barbour's 'other werk'," in Barbour's Bruce, Vol. I, The Scottish Text Society, 1985, pp. 17-37.

In the following essay, McDiarmid and Stevenson examine the arguments for Barbour's authorship of works other than The Bruce.

Gi; barbour's 'othir Werk' =~ Sbarbour's 'othir Werk'

… In his Wallace, XII, 1213-14, Hary speaks of Barbour writing other verse than Bruce, and like Andrew Wyntoun and Walter Bower before him he specifies an account of the origin of the Stewarts. One passage in Wyntoun has been understood to attribute to Barbour a 'Brute', a version of Geoffreyof Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae. A fifteenth-century MS assigns to him the Scots sections of the De Excidio Troiae of Guido delle Colonne. Modern scholars have made him author of all or some of the Scots Legends of the Saints and, despite the date 1438 supplied by the text, author of The Buik of Alexander. Yet other ascriptions of...

(read more)

This section contains 8,539 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Matthew P. McDiarmid and James A. C. Stevenson
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Matthew P. McDiarmid and James A. C. Stevenson from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.