Antony and Cleopatra | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Antony and Cleopatra.

Antony and Cleopatra | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Antony and Cleopatra.
This section contains 933 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Kristin E. Gandrow

SOURCE: Gandrow, Kristin E. Review of Antony and Cleopatra. Theatre Journal 52, no. 1 (2000): 123-25.

In the following review of director Giles Block's 1999 all-male production of Antony and Cleopatra at the Globe Theatre, Gandrow admires the campy but nuanced performance of Mark Rylance as Cleopatra.

The all-male casting of Antony and Cleopatra at Shakespeare's Globe Theatre in London asked a contemporary audience to acknowledge and accept the Elizabethan stage convention of men playing women's roles. Could we forget that the Cleopatra we watched was a man? Not completely. Did that matter? Not really, although it overtly emphasized the humor in the play, which perhaps was Shakespeare's intent all along when he wrote this tragicomic role for a boy. Director Giles Block's 1999 production of Antony and Cleopatra cut only ten lines from this epic. It opened after Mark Rylance directed its companion piece, Julius Caesar, in the season's repertory with the...

(read more)

This section contains 933 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Kristin E. Gandrow
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Kristin E. Gandrow from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.