Antony and Cleopatra | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 16 pages of analysis & critique of Antony and Cleopatra.

Antony and Cleopatra | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 16 pages of analysis & critique of Antony and Cleopatra.
This section contains 4,013 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Clare Kinney

SOURCE: Kinney, Clare. “The Queen's Two Bodies and the Divided Emperor: Some Problems of Identity in Antony and Cleopatra.” In The Renaissance Englishwoman in Print: Counterbalancing the Canon, edited by Anne M. Haselkorn and Betty S. Travitsky, pp. 177-86. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1990.

In the following essay, Kinney contends that Cleopatra is the human embodiment of Egypt and represents an all-inclusive potentiality that embraces the feminine and the masculine.

Cleopatra, like Falstaff, is always being called names. Almost every scene in Antony and Cleopatra generates new identities for her; over the course of the play she acquires at least forty different cognomens. She is gypsy, whore, trull, vile lady, grave charm, morsel, boggler, salt Cleopatra; she is great fairy, nightingale, serpent of old Nile, Egyptian dish; she is, furthermore, most sovereign creature, great Egypt, day o' th' world, lass unparalleled. Constantly avoiding the numerous (and largely male...

(read more)

This section contains 4,013 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Clare Kinney
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Clare Kinney from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.