A Clean, Well-Lighted Place | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 9 pages of analysis & critique of A Clean, Well-Lighted Place.

A Clean, Well-Lighted Place | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 9 pages of analysis & critique of A Clean, Well-Lighted Place.
This section contains 2,209 words
(approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by C. Harold Hurley

SOURCE: “The Manuscript and the Dialogue of ‘A Clean, Well-Lighted Place’: A Response to Warren Bennett,” in The Hemingway Review, Vol. II, No. 1, Fall, 1982, pp. 17-20.

In the following essay, Hurley maintains that Warren Bennett's “misinterpretation of the waiters' speech in the problematic exchange concerning the soldier and the girl compound rather than resolve the existing debate.”

Working from a recently discovered manuscript of Hemingway's “A Clean, Well-Lighted Place,” Warren Bennett resolves many of the questions concerning the story's much debated dialogue.1 As Bennett contends, the manuscript indeed “reveals how the illogical dialogue sequence may have occurred” (p. 616); “clarifies Hemingway's intention as to which waiter knows about the old man's suicide attempt” (p. 616); and demonstrates that Hemingway was himself to blame for “the problem that arises in that crucial sentence which was editorially reassigned by Scribner's” (p. 618). But in addressing “the problematic section of the story concerned with...

(read more)

This section contains 2,209 words
(approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by C. Harold Hurley
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by C. Harold Hurley from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.