The Tariff of 1828, also known as the Tariff of Abominations, enacted on May 19, 1828 (ch. 55, 4 Stat. 270), was a protective tariff passed by the U.S. Congress. It was labeled the "Tariff of Abominations" by its Southern detractors because of the effects it had on the Antebellum Southern economy. It was the highest tariff in U.S. peacetime history, enacting a 62% tax on 92% of all imported goods.[1] The goal of the tariff was to protect industry in the northern United States from competing European goods by increasing the prices of European products. The reaction in the South, particularly in South Carolina, would lead to the Nullification Crisis that began in late 1832.
Passage of the bill
The 1828 tariff was part of a series of tariffs that began after the War of 1812 and the Napoleonic Wars, when a recession in Europe led British manufacturers to offer goods in America at prices American manufacturers often could not match. The first protective tariff was passed by Congress in 1816, with tariff rates increased in 1824. Opponents generally felt that the protective features of tariffs were harmful to agrarian interests and were unconstitutional because they favored one sector of the economy over another. Proponents found no constitutional restriction on the purposes for which tariffs could be enacted. They argued that strengthening the industrial capacity of the nation was in the interest of the entire country. The 1828 tariff was signed by President John Quincy Adams, although he realized it could weaken him politically. In the Presidential election of 1828, Andrew Jackson defeated Adams.
Effects of the tariff
Faced with a reduced market for goods and pressured by British abolitionists, the British reduced their imports of cotton from the United States, which hurt the South. The tariff forced the South to buy manufactured goods from U.S. manufacturers, mainly in the North, at a higher price, while Southern states also faced a reduced income from sales of raw materials. South Carolinian Senator John C. Calhoun strongly opposed the tariff, anonymously authoring a pamphlet in December 1828 titled: The South Carolina Exposition and Protest in which urged nullification of the tariff within South Carolina. The South Carolina legislature, although it printed and distributed 5,000 copies of the pamphlet, took none of the legislative action that the pamphlet urged. The expectation of the tariff’s opponents was that with the election of Jackson in 1828, the tariff would be significantly reduced.[2][3][4] When the Jackson administration failed to address its concerns, the most radical faction in South Carolina began to advocate that the state itself declare the tariff null and void within South Carolina. In Washington, an open split on the issue occurred between Jackson and Vice-President Calhoun.[5][3][4] On July 14, 1832, after Calhoun had resigned his office, Jackson signed into law the Tariff of 1832 which made some reductions in tariff rates. The reductions were too little for South Carolina. In November 1832 the state called for a convention. By a vote of 136 to 26, the convention overwhelmingly adopted an ordinance of nullification drawn by Chancellor William Harper. It declared that the tariffs of both 1828 and 1832 were unconstitutional and unenforceable in South Carolina. While the Nullification Crisis would be resolved in early 1833, tariff policy would continue to be a national political issue between the Democratic Party and the newly emerged Whig Party for the next twenty years.
References
- ^ Buchanan, P.: Where the Right Went Wrong, 154. St. Martin's Press, 2004
- ^ Remini, Robert V., Andrew Jackson and the Course of American Democracy, 1833-1845, pp. 136-137, (1984) ISBN 0-06-015279-6
- ^ a b Niven, John. John C. Calhoun and the Price of Union, pp. 135-137 (1988) ISBN 0-8071-1451-0
- ^ a b Freehling, William W., Prelude to Civil War: The Nullification Crisis in South Carolina 1816-1836, pg 143 (1965) ISBN 0-19-507681-8
- ^ Craven, Avery. The Coming of the Civil War, p. 65 (1942) ISBN 0-226-11894-0
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Internal Revenue |
1861 • 1862 • 1864 • 1913 • 1916 • 1917 • 1918 • 1921 • 1924 • 1926 • 1928 • 1932 • 1934 • 1935 • 1936 • 1940 • 1940 • 1941 • 1942 • 1943 • 1943 • 1944 • 1945 • 1948 • 1950 • 1950 • 1951 • 1954 • 1954 Code • 1962 • 1964 • 1968 • 1969 • 1971 • 1975 • 1976 • 1977 • 1978 • 1981 • 1982 • 1986 • 1986 Code • 1990 • 1993 • 1996 • 1997 • 1998 Reform • 1998 Bill of Rights • 2001 • 2002 • 2003 • 2006 |
| Tariffs | 1789: Hamilton I • • 1792: Hamilton III • 1816: Dallas • 1824: Sectional • 1828: "Abominations" • 1832 • 1833: Compromise • 1842: Black • 1846: Walker • 1857 • 1861: Morrill • 1872 • 1875 • • 1890: McKinley • 1894: Wilson-Gorman • 1897: Dingley • 1909: Payne-Aldrich • 1913: Underwood • 1921: Emergency • 1922: Fordney-McCumber • 1930: Smoot-Hawley • 1934: Reciprocal • 1948: GATT • 1962 • 1974/75 • 1979 • 1984 • 1988 • 1989: Canada FT • 1993: NAFTA • 1994: WTO • 2002: Steel |
