BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help

TOP500

Print-Friendly
About 3 pages (781 words)

Bookmark and Share Know this topic well? Help others and get FREE products!

The TOP500 project ranks and details the 500 most powerful publicly-known computer systems in the world. The project was started in 1993 and publishes an updated list of the supercomputers twice a year. The project aims to provide a reliable basis for tracking and detecting trends in high-performance computing and bases rankings on HPL, a portable implementation of the High-Performance LINPACK benchmark for distributed-memory computers. The TOP500 list is compiled by Hans Meuer of the University of Mannheim, Germany, Jack Dongarra of the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Erich Strohmaier and Horst Simon of NERSC/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The list is updated twice a year. The first of these updates always coincides with the International Supercomputer Conference in June, the second one is presented in November at the IEEE Super Computer Conference in the USA.

Contents

Project history

In the early nineties, a new definition of supercomputer was needed to produce meaningful statistics. After experimenting with metrics based on processor count in 1992, the idea was born at the University of Mannheim to use a detailed listing of installed systems as the basis. Early 1993 Jack Dongarra was convinced to join the project with his Linpack benchmark. A first test version was produced in May 1993, partially based on data available on the Internet, including the following sources:[1][2]

The information from those sources was used for the first two lists. Since June 1993 the TOP500 is produced bi-annually based on site and vendor submissions only.

The systems ranked #1 since 1993

  • IBM Blue Gene/L (since 2004.11)
  • NEC Earth Simulator (2002.06 - 2004.11)
  • IBM ASCI White (2000.11 - 2002.06)
  • Intel ASCI Red (1997.06 - 2000.11)
  • Hitachi CP-PACS (1996.11 - 1997.06)
  • Hitachi SR2201 (1996.06 - 1996.11)
  • Fujitsu Numerical Wind Tunnel (1994.11 - 1996.06)
  • Intel Paragon XP/S140 (1994.06 - 1994.11)
  • Fujitsu Numerical Wind Tunnel (1993.11 - 1994.06)
  • TMC CM-5 (1993.06 - 1993.11)

List as of November 2007

The following table gives the Top 10 positions of the 30th TOP500 List released during the SC07 conference, November 12, 2007 in Reno, Nevada.[3]

Rank Site
Country
Year installed
Name
Computer
Processors
Maker Rmax
Rpeak
(Tflops)
1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
United States
2005
BlueGene/L
eServer Blue Gene Solution
212992 (Power)
IBM 478.2
596.4
2 Jülich Research Centre
Germany
2007
JUGENE
BlueGene/P Solution
65536 (Power)
IBM 167.3
222.8
3 New Mexico Computing Applications Center
United States
2007
SGI Altix ICE 8200
14336 (Xeon), InfiniBand
SGI 126.9
172.0
4 Computational Research Laboratories
India
2007
EKA
Cluster Platform 3000
14240 (Xeon), InfiniBand
HP 117.9
170.9
5 Swedish National Defence Radio Establishment
Sweden
2007
Cluster Platform 3000
13728 (Xeon), InfiniBand
HP 102.8
146.4
6 Sandia National Laboratories
United States
2006
Red Storm
Cray XT3
26569 (Opteron)
Cray 102.2
127.5
7 Oak Ridge National Laboratory
United States
2006
Jaguar
Cray XT4/XT3
23016 (Opteron)
Cray 101.7
119.4
8 IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center
United States
2005
BGW
eServer Blue Gene Solution
40960 (Power)
IBM 91.3
114.7
9 National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
United States
2007
Franklin
Cray XT4/XT3
19320 (Opteron)
Cray 85.4
100.5
10 Stony Brook University/Brookhaven National Laboratory
United States
2007
New York Blue
eServer Blue Gene Solution
36864 (Power)
IBM 82.2
103.2

Trends

A paper[4] made available in early 2007 presents the results of some statistical analysis of the Top 500 from 1993 to 2006. Some of the conclusions are:

  • Each list exhibits a Zipf distribution
  • Speeds increase by about 90% per year.
  • The relative power of the bottom of the list as compared to the top of the list has increased each year.

Systems of interest

The MDGRAPE-3 supercomputer reportedly reached a one petaflops calculation speed, faster than any of those on the TOP500 list, though it does not qualify as a general-purpose supercomputer, and cannot run the benchmarking software used to gauge the speeds computed for the list. Grid computing systems are also not included on the list.

References

  1. ^ http://www.hpcwire.com/archives/10219.html
  2. ^ http://www.netlib.org/benchmark/top500/reports/report93/section2_16_4.html
  3. ^ http://sc07.supercomputing.org/
  4. ^ A note on the Zipf distribution of Top500 supercomputers, Matei Ripeanu, in IEEE Distributed Systems Online

External links

View More Summaries on TOP500
 
Ask any question on TOP500 and get it answered FAST!
Answer questions in BookRags Q&A and earn points toward
discounted or even FREE Study Guides and other BookRags products!
Learn more about BookRags Q&A
Copyrights
TOP500 from Wíkipedia. ©2006 by Wíkipedia. Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. View a list of authors or edit this article.

Article Navigation
Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags




About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy