| Part of the Politics series on Social democracy |
| Precursors |
| The Age of Enlightenment |
| Utopian socialism |
| Trade Unionism |
| The Revolutions of 1848 |
| Orthodox Marxism |
| Politics |
| Representative democracy |
| Labour rights |
| Civil liberties |
| Welfare state |
| Mixed economy |
| Secularism |
| Fair trade |
| Environmental protection |
| Organizations |
| Social democratic parties |
| Socialist International |
| Party of European Socialists |
| ITUC |
| Important figures |
| Eduard Bernstein |
| Hjalmar Branting |
| Friedrich Ebert |
| Jean Jaurès |
| Léon Blum |
| Karl Kautsky |
| Ignacy Daszyński |
| Ramsay MacDonald |
| Clement Attlee |
| Politics Portal · |
The Scandinavian welfare model is often used as a general term for the way in which Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland and Iceland have chosen to organise and finance their social security systems, health services and education. The Scandinavian countries are clearly distinguished from other European countries in these areas.
Welfare Benefits
The principle behind the Scandinavian welfare model is a model built on Lutheran values that benefits should be given to all citizens who fulfill the conditions, without regard to employment or family situation. The system covers everyone; it is universal. In addition, the benefits are given to the individual, so that e.g. married women have rights independently of their husbands. In the Scandinavian countries, the State is involved in financing and organising the welfare benefits available to the citizens to a far greater extent than in other European countries. For that reason the welfare model is accompanied by a taxation system which has both a broad basis of taxation, high taxation burden and resulting income redistribution to those not productive in the society. The benefits given are more generous than is the case in the British Beveridge model – and in combination with the taxation system this brings about a greater redistribution than is the case in the Bismarck welfare model, which is aimed rather at maintaining the present status. Economists in favour of the Scandinavian pattern of organisation argue that it is far simpler and immediately comprehensible than is the case in the other European countries. In the Scandinavian countries most of the social welfare tasks are undertaken by the State or local authorities, and only to a limited extent by individuals, families, churches or national welfare organisations. Economists against the Scandinavian pattern point at the increased state interference in all public matters, and forced redistribution of income, which leaves the more productive members of the society without the rewards for their labours. Furthermore, Mises Institute research indicates that the increased state involvement in previously privately maintained aspects of society, such as child and elderly family care has resulted in disintegration of traditional family values.
See also
External links
- Potemkin Village
- A Case Study in Social Democracy
- The Silent Partner in Family Decline
- Beyond Ideology, The Social Welfare State A defense of the Scandinavian welfare model


