|
|
This article or section is missing citations or needs footnotes. Using inline citations helps guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies. (June 2007) |
In education, Response To Intervention (commonly abbreviated RTI or RtI) is a method of academic intervention that is designed to provide early, effective assistance to children who are having difficulty learning. Response to intervention was concurrently designed to function as a data-based process of diagnosing learning disabilities. This method can be used at the group and individual level. The RTI method has been developed by researchers as an alternative to identifying learning disabilities with the ability-achievement discrepancy model, which requires children to exhibit a severe discrepancy between their IQ and academic achievement as measured by standardized tests. Further, the RtI process brings more clarity to the Specific Learning Disability (SLD) category of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (2004), which has been referred to as a residual category for children with moderate learning problems. [1] RtI seeks to prevent academic failure through early intervention, frequent progress measurement, and increasingly intensive research-based instructional interventions for children who continue to have difficulty. Students who do not show a response to effective interventions are likely (or, more likely than students who respond) to have biologically-based learning disabilities and to be in need of special education. [2] For children with learning disabilities, RtI may assist schools in avoiding the so-called "wait-to-fail" method by providing intervention as soon as children exhibit difficulty.
Contents |
Description
Response To Intervention is a method, or process, of educational intervention which includes, but is not limited to: reading tutoring, peer tutoring, and phonics interventions. Key to the RtI method is the application of scientifically-based interventions that have been demonstrated to work in randomized controlled trials. The RtI method assumes accountability to the consumers of an educational program by ensuring the application of programs that work rather than programs that simply look, sound, or feel good. In terms of its methods, after the intervention, collecting of data on change in student performance is undertaken. Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM) is often used to collect data on interventions and their effectiveness. CBM has over 30 years of scientific support (www.studentprogress.org). Response to intervention is based on discovering what works best for an individual student, not what might be the 'best' intervention for everyone. Additional methods are tried until students 'respond' to the intervention and improve their skills. Students that do not respond, or respond at significantly low rates, are deemed to have biologically-based learning disabilities, not simply learning difficulties. RTI provides an alternative or additional means of gathering information to be used when classifying students for special education. When a student is identified as having difficulties in school, a team provides interventions of increasing intensity to help the child catch up with the rest of his or her peers. After interventions have been tried and proven ineffective, the child may then be referred for additional, special education services (IDEA). RTI is a way to ensure each student is afforded the opportunity to learn.
See also
Notes
- ^ Haager, Diane et al. Evidence-Based Reading Practices for Response to Intervention, Brooks Publishing, 2007.
- ^ Cortiella, Candace, Response-to-Intervention — An Emerging Method for LD Identification, Schwab Learning http://www.schwablearning.org/articles.aspx?r=840, Retrieved August 2, 2007.
References
Books
- David L. Wodrich, Ara J. Schmitt (2006). Patterns of Learning Disorders: Working Systematically from Assessment to Intervention. 306 pages.
- Lawrence M. Siegel, (2005). Nolo's IEP Guide: Learning Disabilities. 450 pages
- Alan W. Brue, Linda Wilmshurst (2005). A Parent's Guide to Special Education. 262 pages.
- Howard S Adelman, Linda L. Taylor (2005). The School Leader's Guide to Student Learning Supports. 408 page.
- United States Congress. House. Committee on Education and the Workforce. Subcommittee on Education Reform (2003). Idea: Focusing on Improving Results for Children with Disabilities. 121 pages.
- Rachel Brown-Chidsey - 2005). Assessment for Intervention: A Problem-solving Approach. 382 pages.
- National Association of Social Workers (1987). Encyclopedia of Social Work. 2396 pages
- Flanagan, Dawn P., Patti L. Harrison (2005). Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues. 667 pages.
- Maynard Clinton Reynolds, Margaret C. Wang, Herbert J. Walberg (1987). Handbook of Special Education: research and practice.
- Randy Chapman (2005) The Everyday Guide to Special Education Law. 126 pages
Articles
- T Kubiszyn (1984). Educational testing and measurement. GD Borich. (media.wiley.com)
- D Fuchs, LS Fuchs (2006). Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, Why, and How Valid Is It?. Reading Research Quarterly,
- JK Klingner, PA Edward (2006). Cultural Considerations With Response to Intervention Models. Reading Research Quarterly, .
- FM Gresham, et al. (2004). Comprehensive evaluation of learning disabilities: A response to intervention perspective. The School Psychologist (cssponline.org)
- PA Edwards (2006). Cultural considerations with Response to Intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly. (reading.org)
- AM VanDerHeyden, SR Jimerson (2006). Using Response-to-Intervention to Enhance Outcomes for Children. California School Psychologist. (caspsurveys.org)
- DW Barnett, EJ Daly III, KM Jones, FE Lentz Jr (2004). Response to Intervention. Journal of Special Education. (questia.com)


