BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help
Not What You Meant?  There are 14 definitions for Per.

Partial equivalence relation

Print-Friendly
About 1 pages (392 words)

Bookmark and Share Questions on this topic? Just ask!

In mathematics, a partial equivalence relation (often abbreviated as PER) R on a set X is a relation which is symmetric and transitive. In other words, it holds for all a, b and c in X that:

  1. (Symmetry) if a R b then b R a
  2. (Transitivity) if a R b and b R c then a R c

If R is reflexive, then R is an equivalence relation. On the other hand, R could be taken as the empty relation, so that there are PERs that are not equivalence relations. There is in fact a simple structure to the general PER R on X: it is an equivalence relation on some subset Y of X, such that in the complement of Y no element is related by R to any other. Concretely, let <math>Y = \{ x \in X | x\,R\,x\}</math>. By construction, <math>R</math> is reflexive on <math>Y</math> and therefore an equivalence relation on <math>Y</math>. But if <math>z \notin Y</math>, then there is no <math>w \in X</math> for which z R w; if there were, then by symmetry we would have w R z, which implies z R z by transitivity, contradicting <math>z \notin Y</math>.

Example

For an example of a PER, consider a set <math>A</math> and a partial function <math>f</math> that is defined on some elements of <math>A</math> but not all. Then the relation <math>\approx</math> defined by

<math>x \approx y</math> if and only if <math>f</math> is defined at both <math>x</math> and <math>y</math>, and <math>f(x) = f(y)</math>

is a partial equivalence relation but not an equivalence relation. It possesses the symmetry and transitivity properties, but it is not reflexive since if <math>f(x)</math> is not defined then <math>x \not\approx x</math> -- in fact, for such an <math>x</math> there is no <math>y \in A</math> such that <math>x \approx y</math>. It follows immediately that the subset of <math>A</math> for which <math>\approx</math> is an equivalence relation is precisely the subset on which <math>f</math> is defined.

Uses

PER's are used mainly in computer science, in type theory. It is also used in constructive mathematics to define setoids, sometimes called partial setoids. The action of forming one from a type and a PER is an analogue to the operations of subset and quotient in classical set-theoretic mathematics.

See also

View More Summaries on Partial equivalence relation
 
Ask any question on Partial equivalence relation and get it answered FAST!
Answer questions in BookRags Q&A and earn points toward
discounted or even FREE Study Guides and other BookRags products!
Learn more about BookRags Q&A
Copyrights
Partial equivalence relation from Wíkipedia. ©2006 by Wíkipedia. Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. View a list of authors or edit this article.

Article Navigation
Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags




About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy