Nicholson v. Haldimand-Norfolk Reg. Police Commrs., [1979] 1 S.C.R. 311 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian administrative law. The decision was a landmark reform of administrative law, where the Court significantly increased the degree of court intervention on procedural grounds. The Court stated that procedural fairness exists on a continuum that entitles the parties based on the setting and circumstances. Prior to this decision, procedural fairness only applied to tribunals that were classified as "judicial" or "quasi-judicial". Nicholson was employed for a period of 18 months by the regional police when he was terminated without any reason given. The employer claimed that the Police Act allowed them to dismiss him at will. Nicholson, however, argued that he had a common law right to be treated fairly and be notified of the reasons for his termination. The issue before the Supreme Court of Canada was whether Nicholson's employers were entitled to terminate him without a hearing and without any reasons given. The Court found that Nicholson was entitled to a common law duty of fairness and so should have been able to make submissions to the employer and should have been notified orally or in writing.
