BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help

Lubell-Yamamoto-Meshalkin inequality

Print-Friendly
About 1 pages (405 words)

Bookmark and Share Know this topic well? Help others and get FREE products!

In combinatorial mathematics, the Lubell-Yamamoto-Meshalkin inequality, more commonly known as the LYM inequality, is an inequality on the sizes of sets in a Sperner family, proved by Bollobás (1965), Lubell (1966), Meshalkin (1963), and Yamamoto (1954). It is named for the initials of three of its discoverers. The term is also used for similar inequalities. Theorem. Let U be a set of n items, let A be a family of subsets of U such that no set in A is a subset of another set in A, and let ak denote the number of sets of size k in A. Then

<math>\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{a_k} \le 1.</math>

Proof. (Lubell 1966) We consider the powerset of U as a lattice, partially ordered by the subset relationship; in order-theoretic terminology, A is an antichain in this lattice. Consider an element K of A, with |K| = k. There are exactly k!(n-k)! maximal chains that contain K, as we can start from the empty set and get to K by adding one element at a time in k! ways, and then we complete the maximal chain by adding in the other n-k elements one at a time. This method counts maximal chains, and we never count the same maximal chain twice, for if the same chain was counted from two sets K and L then it means that either KL or LK, either of which contradicts the fact that both sets are part of an antichain. As the number of chains counted by this method cannot exceed n!, the total number of maximal chains, we have

<math>\sum_{K \in A} k! (n-k)! = \sum_{k=0}^n a_k k! (n-k)! \le n!.</math>

Finally we divide the above inequality by n! to obtain the result. <math>\Box</math> This inequality has many applications in combinatorics; in particular, it can be used to prove Sperner's theorem.

References

  • Bollobás, B. (1965), "On generalized graphs", Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar., 16: 447–452.
  • Lubell, D. (1966), "A short proof of Sperner's theorem", Journal of Combinatorial Theory 1: 299.
  • Meshalkin, L. D. (1963), "Generalization of Sperner's theorem on the number of subsets of a finite set", Theory of Probability and its Applications 8: 203–204.
  • Yamamoto, Koichi (1954), "Logarithmic order of free distributive lattice", Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan 6: 343–353.

View More Summaries on Lubell-Yamamoto-Meshalkin inequality
 
Ask any question on Lubell-Yamamoto-Meshalkin inequality and get it answered FAST!
Answer questions in BookRags Q&A and earn points toward
discounted or even FREE Study Guides and other BookRags products!
Learn more about BookRags Q&A
Copyrights
Lubell-Yamamoto-Meshalkin inequality from Wíkipedia. ©2006 by Wíkipedia. Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. View a list of authors or edit this article.

Article Navigation
Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags




About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy