BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help
Not What You Meant?  There are 28 definitions for Cone.

Cone (formal languages)

Print-Friendly
About 1 pages (410 words)

Bookmark and Share Questions on this topic? Just ask!

In formal language theory, a cone is an abstract family of languages of that is closed under homomorphism, inverse homomorphism, and intersection with a regular languages [1] More precisely, a cone is a non-empty family <math>\mathcal{S}</math> of languages such that, for any <math>L \in \mathcal{S}</math> over some alphabet <math>\Sigma</math>,

  • if <math>h</math> is an homomorphism from <math>\Sigma^\ast</math> to some <math>\Delta^\ast</math>, the language <math>h(L)</math> is in <math>\mathcal{S}</math>;
  • if <math>h</math> is an homomorphism from some <math>\Delta^\ast</math> to <math>\Sigma^\ast</math>, the language <math>h^{-1}(L)</math> is in <math>\mathcal{S}</math>;
  • if <math>R</math> is any regular language over <math>\Sigma</math>, then <math>L\cap R</math> is in <math>\mathcal{S}</math>.

The family of all regular languages is contained in any cone. If one restricts the definition to homomorphisms that do not introduce the empty word <math>\lambda</math> then one speaks of a faithful cone; the inverse homomorphisms are not restricted. Within the Chomsky hierarchy, the regular languages, the context-free languages, and the recursively enumerable languages are all cones, whereas the context sensitive languages and the recursive languages are only faithful cones. The terminology cone has a French origin. In the American oriented literature one usually speaks of a full trio. The trio corresponds to the faithful cone.

Relation to Transducers

A finite state transducer is a finite state automaton that has both input and output. It defines a transduction <math>T</math>, mapping a language <math>K</math> over the input alphabet into another language <math>T(K)</math> over the output alphabet. Each of the cone operations (homomorphism, inverse homomorphism, intersection with a regular language) can be implemented using a finite state transducer. And, since finite state transducers are closed under composition, every sequence of cone operations can be performed by a finite state transducer. Conversely, every finite state transduction <math>T</math> can be decomposed into cone operations. In fact, there exists a normal form for this decomposition <math>T(K) = g(h^{-1}(K \cap R))</math>, where <math>g, h</math> are homomorphisms, and <math>R</math> is a regular language determined by <math>T</math>. All together this means that a family of languages is a cone iff it is closed under finite state transductions. This is a very powerful set of operations. For instance one easily writes a (nondeterministic) finite state transducer with alphabet <math>\{a,b\}</math> that removes every second <math>b</math> in words of even length (and does not change words otherwise). Since the context-free languages form a cone, they are closed under this exotic operation.

References

  1. ^ Seymour Ginsburg; Sheila Greibach (1967). "{{{title}}}". Proceedings of the IEEE Eighth Annual Symposium on Switching and Automata Theory. 

View More Summaries on Cone (formal languages)
 
Ask any question on Cone (formal languages) and get it answered FAST!
Answer questions in BookRags Q&A and earn points toward
discounted or even FREE Study Guides and other BookRags products!
Learn more about BookRags Q&A
Copyrights
Cone (formal languages) from Wíkipedia. ©2006 by Wíkipedia. Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. View a list of authors or edit this article.

Article Navigation
Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags




About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy