BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help

Complex instruction set computer

Print-Friendly
About 3 pages (845 words)
Complex instruction set computer Summary

Bookmark and Share Know this topic well? Help others and get FREE products!
"CISC" redirects here. CISC is also an abbreviation for the Centre for Innovation and Structural Change.

A complex instruction set computer (CISC, pronounced like "sisk") is a microprocessor instruction set architecture (ISA) in which each instruction can execute several low-level operations, such as a load from memory, an arithmetic operation, and a memory store, all in a single instruction. The term was retroactively coined in contrast to reduced instruction set computer (RISC).

Contents

Historical design context

Incitaments and benefits

Before the RISC philosophy became prominent, many computer architects tried to bridge the so called semantic gap, i.e. to design instruction sets that directly supported high-level programming constructs such as procedure calls, loop control, and complex addressing modes, allowing data structure and array accesses to be combined into single instructions. The compact nature of such instruction sets results in smaller program sizes and fewer calls to main memory, which at the time (early 1960s and onwards) resulted in a tremendous savings on the cost of computer memory and disc storage. It also meant good programming productivity even in assembly language, as high level languages such as Fortran or Algol, were not always available or appropriate.

Problems

While many designs achieved the aim of higher throughput at lower cost and also allowed high-level language constructs to be expressed by fewer instructions, it was observed that this was not always the case. For instance, low-end versions of complex architectures (i.e. using less hardware) could lead to situations where it was possible to improve performance by not using a complex instruction (such as a procedure call instruction), but instead using a sequence of simpler instructions. One reason for this was that architects (microcode writers) sometimes "over-designed" assembler language instructions, i.e. including features which were not possible to implement efficiently on the basic hardware available. This could, for instance, be "side effects" (above conventional flags), such as the setting of a register or memory location that were perhaps seldom used; if this were done via ordinary (non duplicated) internal buses (or even the external bus), it would demand extra cycles every time, and thus be quite inefficient. Even in balanced high performance designs, such high level instruction sets, often also highly encoded (for a compact executable code), could be complicated to decode and execute efficiently within a limited transistor budget. These architectures therefore require a great deal of work on the part of the processor designer (or a simpler and slower microcode solution). At the time where transistors were a limited resource, this also left less room on the processor to optimize performance in other ways, which gave room for the ideas that led to the original RISC designs in the mid-1970s (IBM 801 - IBMs Watson Research Center). Transistors for logic are no longer a scarce resource however, and together with better tools and new technologies, this has led to new implementations of variable length, highly encoded designs without load-store limitations (i.e. non RISC); this governs re-implementations of older instruction-sets (such as the ubiquitous x86, see below), as well as new designs for microcontrollers for embedded systems, and similar uses.

CISC and RISC processors

Examples of CISC processors are the System/360 (excluding the 'scientific' Model 44), VAX, PDP-11, Motorola 68000 family, and Intel x86 architecture based processors. The terms RISC and CISC have become less meaningful with the continued evolution of both CISC and RISC designs and implementations. The first highly pipelined "CISC" implementations, such as 486s from Intel, AMD, Cyrix, and IBM, certainly supported every instruction that their predecessors did, but achieved high efficiency only on a fairly simple x86 subset (resembling a RISC instruction set, but without the load-store limitations of RISC). Modern x86 processors also decode and split more complex instructions into a series of smaller internal "micro-operations" which can thereby be executed in a pipelined (parallel) fashion, thus achieving high performance on a much larger subset of instructions.

See also

This article was originally based on material from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing, which is licensed under the GFDL.

View More Summaries on Complex instruction set computer
More Information
  • View Complex instruction set computer Study Pack
  • Search Results for "Complex instruction set computer"
  • Add This to Your Bibliography
  • More Products on This Subject
    Cisc (Complex Instruction Set Computer)
    A Complex Instruction Set Computer (CISC) supplies a large number of complex instructions at the assembly language level. Assembly language is a low-level computer programming language in which each statement corresponds to a single machine instruction.... more


     
    Ask any question on Complex instruction set computer and get it answered FAST!
    Answer questions in BookRags Q&A and earn points toward
    discounted or even FREE Study Guides and other BookRags products!
    Learn more about BookRags Q&A
    Copyrights
    Complex instruction set computer from Wíkipedia. ©2006 by Wíkipedia. Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. View a list of authors or edit this article.

    Article Navigation
    Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags




    About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy