BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help
Not What You Meant?  There are 14 definitions for Bayesian.

Bayesian model comparison

Print-Friendly
About 1 pages (419 words)

Bookmark and Share Questions on this topic? Just ask!

A common problem in statistical inference is to use data to decide between two or more competing models. Frequentist statistics uses hypothesis tests for this purpose. There are several Bayesian approaches. One approach is through Bayes factors. The posterior probability of a model given data, Pr(H|D), is given by Bayes' theorem:

<math>Pr(H|D) = \frac{Pr(D|H)Pr(H)}{Pr(D)}</math>

The key data-dependent term Pr(D|H) is a likelihood, and is sometimes called the evidence for model H; evaluating it correctly is the key to Bayesian model comparison. The evidence is usually the normalizing constant or partition function of another inference, namely the inference of the parameters of model H given the data D. The plausibility of two different models H1 and H2, parametrised by model parameter vectors <math> \theta_1 </math> and <math> \theta_2 </math> is assessed by the Bayes factor given by

<math> \frac{\Pr(D|H_2)}{\Pr(D|H_1)}

= \frac{\int \Pr(\theta_2|H_2)\Pr(D|\theta_2,H_2)\,d\theta_2} {\int \Pr(\theta_1|H_1)\Pr(D|\theta_1,H_1)\,d\theta_1 } </math> Thus the Bayesian model comparison does not depend on the parameters used by each model. Instead, it considers the probability of the model considering all possible parameter values. Alternatively, the Maximum likelihood estimate could be used for each of the parameters. An advantage of the use of Bayes factors is that it automatically, and quite naturally, includes a penalty for including too much model structure. It thus guards against overfitting. Another approach is to treat model comparison as a decision problem, computing the expected value or cost of each model choice. Another approach is to use Minimum Message Length (MML).

See also

References

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J.,Stern, H. and Rubin, D. Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC.(1995)
  • Bernardo, J., and Smith, A.F.M., Bayesian Theory. John Wiley. (1994)
  • Lee, P.M. Bayesian Statistics. Arnold.(1989).
  • Denison, D.G.T., Holmes, C.C., Mallick, B.K., Smith, A.F.M., Bayesian Methods for Nonlinear Classification and Regression. John Wiley. (2002).
  • Richard O. Duda, Peter E. Hart, David G. Stork (2000) Pattern classification (2nd edition), Section 9.6.5, p. 487-489, Wiley, ISBN 0-471-05669-3
  • Chapter 24 in Probability Theory - The logic of science by E. T. Jaynes, 1994.
  • David J.C. MacKay (2003) Information theory, inference and learning algorithms, CUP, ISBN 0-521-64298-1, (also available online)

External links

View More Summaries on Bayesian model comparison
 
Ask any question on Bayesian model comparison and get it answered FAST!
Answer questions in BookRags Q&A and earn points toward
discounted or even FREE Study Guides and other BookRags products!
Learn more about BookRags Q&A
Copyrights
Bayesian model comparison from Wíkipedia. ©2006 by Wíkipedia. Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. View a list of authors or edit this article.

Article Navigation
Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags




About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy