BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help


Verbal Vs Root Compound

Print-Friendly  Order the PDF version  Order the RTF version
About 1 pages (101 words)
Classical Nahuatl grammar Summary

Bookmark and Share Know this topic well? Help others and get FREE products!

Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics

verbal vs root compound

In the word formation of Roeper and Siegel (1978), terms coined to denote two types of composition. Verbal compounds show, as their second element, a deverbal derivate; their first elements are understood as an argument of the base verb (oven-cleaner, strange-sounding, expert-tested). The relation that connects the first element with the second element of root compounds, on the other hand, is not grammatically given, but is basically open (apron string). ( also determinative compound, inheritance)

References

Roeper, T.

and M.Siegel, 1978. A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. LingI 9. 199–259.

Selkirk, E. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge.

This is the complete article, containing 101 words (approx. 1 page at 300 words per page).

View More Summaries on Classical Nahuatl grammar

 
Ask any question on Classical Nahuatl grammar and get it answered FAST!
Answer questions in BookRags Q&A and earn points toward
discounted or even FREE Study Guides and other BookRags products!
Learn more about BookRags Q&A
Copyrights
Verbal Vs Root Compound from Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. ISBN: 0-203-98005-0. Published: 12-03-1998. ©2009 Taylor and Francis. All rights reserved.



Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags


About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy