BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help

Not What You Meant?  There are 17 definitions for Powers.  Also try: Balance of power.

Separation Of Powers

Print-Friendly  Order the PDF version  Order the RTF version
About 1 pages (359 words)
Separation of powers Summary

Bookmark and Share Know this topic well? Help others and get FREE products!

The Routledge Dictionary of Politics, Third Edition

Separation of Powers

Separation of powers, a classic doctrine of liberal politics, is associated with both Locke and Montesquieu, and is supposed to typify, above that of all other countries, the structure of the US Constitution. The idea is that the dangers of political power overcoming the public interest will be minimized if the different sorts of legal power are distinguished and handed to separate bodies for exercise. The three forms of power that are usually identified are the rule-making power (legislature), the power to apply rules and policies (executive) and the power to try alleged offenders against these rules (judiciary).

If these three types of power are rigorously separated, with checks against the usurpation of one type of power by another agency, it is thought that the utilization of power will be kept under control. Furthermore it is seen as inherently likely that abuse of power will arise if, for example, the same body both makes a rule and decides if someone has broken it.

Few political systems operate, even in theory, by a strict separation of power—the role of judicial power in the United Kingdom, for example, is less than clear, and both parliament, the legislative body, and the cabinet, as the executive, interpenetrate each other’s area. (This has begun to be politically controversial at the beginning of the 21st century because of the role of the Lord Chancellor, who is the head of the judiciary, the presiding officer of the House of Lords, and a cabinet member heading an executive department. Even the senior judiciary have called for an end to this anomaly.) However, the distinction between legislature and executive is valid, and keeping at least roughly to it not only reduces the dangers of abuse of power, but probably makes for more efficient government. One of the major problems with totalitarian political systems, or with one-party states and military dictatorships, is that the desires of one major group are not only politically dominant, but are exercised in all three fields. The doctrine is closely linked to the idea of the rule of law, which absolutely requires a separation between at least the executive and judiciary.

This is the complete article, containing 359 words (approx. 1 page at 300 words per page).

View More Summaries on Separation of powers

Ask any question on Separation of powers and get it answered FAST!
Answer questions in BookRags Q&A and earn points toward
discounted or even FREE Study Guides and other BookRags products!
Learn more about BookRags Q&A
Copyrights
Separation Of Powers from The Routledge Dictionary of Politics, Third Edition. ISBN: 0-203-3620-6. Published: 2004–02–19. ©2009 Taylor and Francis. All rights reserved.



Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags


About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy