BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help


Search "Emic And Etic"

Navigation

Emic And Etic

Print-Friendly  Order the PDF version  Order the RTF version
About 1 pages (342 words)
Emic and etic Summary

Bookmark and Share Know this topic well? Help others and get FREE products!

Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology

emic and etic

The terms ‘emic’ and ‘etic’ were widely used in the American anthropology of the 1960s and 1970s, and the distinction between ‘emic’ and ‘etic’ levels of analysis was a commonplace in the areas of linguistic anthropology known variously as *componential analysis or *ethnoscience. ‘Emic’ and ‘etic’ (derived respectively from †‘phonemic’ and †‘phonetic’) designate two contrasting levels of data or methods of analysis. An emic model is one which explains the ideology or behaviour of members of a culture according to indigenous definitions. An etic model is one which is based on criteria from outside a particular culture. Etic models are held to be universal; emic models are culture-specific.

Just as phonetic and phonemic levels imply different methods of analysis, so too do etic and emic levels. So-called cognitive anthropologists, especially in the 1960s, were interested mainly in emic analysis (Tyler 1969).

They saw culture as possessing structures similar to those of language. In contrast, anthropologists influenced by *cultural materialism, especially in the 1970s, were more interested in etic analysis. They saw culture in terms of minimal units which defined appropriate behaviour, often in direct response to environmental circumstances (see Headland, Pike, and Harris 1990).

The terms ‘emic’ and ‘etic’ were first employed by †Kenneth L.Pike in his monumental book, Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. As this title suggests, their origin and early use reflect not only the analogy between †phonological (phonemic) and cultural (emic) data, but also Pike’s theoretical stance (which sees linguistics as closely related to behavioural psychology) and his search for a grand theory which could encompass both language and culture. The subfields of †‘cognitive anthropology’, ‘the new ethnography’ and ‘ethnoscience’ which emerged in the 1960s all stem ultimately from Pike’s original concerns. These approaches emphasized emic over etic approaches through the meticulous analysis of semantic fields and indigenous classifications, and practitioners sought to apply Pike’s distinction both as a method of ethnographic research and as an aid to the theoretical understanding of the relation between specific and universal aspects of culture.

This is the complete article, containing 342 words (approx. 1 page at 300 words per page).

View More Summaries on Emic and etic

 
Ask any question on Emic and etic and get it answered FAST!
Answer questions in BookRags Q&A and earn points toward
discounted or even FREE Study Guides and other BookRags products!
Learn more about BookRags Q&A
Copyrights
Emic And Etic from Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology. ISBN: 0-203-45803-6. Published: 05-30-2002. ©2009 Taylor and Francis. All rights reserved.



Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags


About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy