Readers should now have a list of items that support the author's claim and refute it. Just because one side may have more items listed, however, does not necessarily mean that the truth belongs on that side; some evidence is more important and should be given more weight when making a decision. In some cases, a person's reputation may have more weight than the lack of corroboration, but the opposite may hold true as well. What do you think? Has Mullis presented enough evidence to support his claim that he was abducted by aliens"