Intentionality [addendum]
The medieval word intentionality was reintroduced into late nineteenth-century philosophy by Franz Clemens Brentano. Intentionality is the power of minds to represent, stand for, or be about things, properties, and states of affairs. The English word intentionality stems from the Latin verb intendere, which can be used to denote the act of stretching a bow string with the aim of propelling an arrow into its target. In Brentano's sense intentionality is the mental tension whereby the human mind aims at objects. The nature of intentionality has been a central topic in the philosophy of mind and language in the twentieth century in both the phenomenological tradition (founded by Edmund Husserl, a student of Brentano) and the analytic tradition.
In several well-known paragraphs from his 1874 classical work, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, quoted by Roderick M. Chisholm at the beginning of his entry, Brentano did two things: he provided a puzzling definition of intentionality and he put forward the thesis that intentionality is the mark of the mental. This entry briefly considers some of the logical and ontological puzzles raised by Brentano's definition of intentionality. It then turns toward issues raised by Brentano's thesis that intentionality is the mark of the mental, considering whether only mental (or psychological) phenomena exhibit intentionality and whether all do, in this order.
This page contains 201 words.
![Purchase our Intentionality [addendum] article](https://www.bookrags.com/images/funnel/continue.png)
Intentionality [addendum] article
Read the rest of this article.
This article contains 4,043 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page).