Historic Dispute : Are Earth's Continents Stationary Throughout Geologic Time?
Viewpoint: Yes, the best available and most widely accepted models of Earth's structure once precluded large-scale horizontal motion of continents.
Viewpoint: No, geologic evidence shows that the continents had once been in very different positions, and thus must have moved great distances across Earth's surface over time.
Scientific ideas and theories change through gradual evolution and sudden revolution. Sometimes the systematic exploration of shared principles leads to an expansion and accumulation of knowledge about a subject; other times, competing concepts about the most fundamental hypotheses of a field clash for acceptance. For several decades during the twentieth century, earth scientists wrestled with an idea at the very foundation of their field: had the continents we observe on Earth today been stationary throughout history, or had subterranean forces reshaped the pattern of land and sea throughout time? The reluctance of many scientists to accept the concept of continental drift was rooted not only in reservations they had about the nature of the evidence cited to support the novel theory, but also in concerns about the very kind of theory it was.
To understand why the theory of continental drift seemed so unacceptable to earth scientists during the twentieth century, it helps to understand the guiding methods of geology that had been developed during the previous two hundred years.
This is a free page. This page contains 201 words. This
article contains 5,551 words (approx. 19 pages at 300
words per page).
Read the rest of this Article with our Historic Dispute : Are Earth's Continents Stationary Throughout Geologic Time Access Pass.
