Forgot your password?  

Not What You Meant?  There are 36 definitions for Queen.  Also try: Transvestism.

Drag | Research & Encyclopedia Articles

Print-Friendly   Order the PDF version   Order the RTF version
About 4 pages (1,078 words)
Drag queen Summary

 


Drag

"Drag" was originally a theatrical term used to describe the women's clothing a man wore on stage. It came into use in the 1870s at the same time that cross-dressing, or dressing as the opposite sex, became popular in vaudeville variety shows. Men would dress in "drag" and women would "wear breeches," each one poking fun at the foibles and anxieties of the opposite sex. By the 1940s, drag had come to describe professional female impersonators and had begun to take on meanings associated with male homosexuality. Gay men who wore women's clothes off-stage started to be characterized as men in "drag" by mid-century.

Since the 1950s, the term "drag" has come to describe a form of cross-dressing for both men and women that intends to expose itself as false. In other words, men and women in drag broadcast the fact that they are dressed up as one sex or the other. Unlike some cross-dressers, they are not interested in wearing costumes that disguise who they "really" are underneath. Instead, they make costumes that are clearly costumes, putting on clothes that are stereotypically men's or women's, like floor length evening gowns, high heels, bow ties, or three-piece suits. Men and women in drag work to exaggerate masculine and feminine gestures, facial expressions, tones of voice,and scenarios in order to simultaneously enhance their performance and underline the fact that they are performing. Drag is most commonly associated with "drag queens," or male performers who dress up as women. But, it can still describe women dressed as men, or even women dressed as women or men dressed as men as long as their outfits are designed to produce the sense that the gender they are performing is self-consciously acted out.

A man in "drag" applies lipstick before a photo shoot in Philadelphia, 1995.A man in "drag" applies lipstick before a photo shoot in Philadelphia, 1995.

Gay male nightclubs often host "drag shows" as part of their nightly or weekly ritual, especially in urban areas with large gay populations like San Francisco or New York. These variety shows usually feature a line-up of drag queens who "lip-sync" to popular songs by female artists—moving their lips and performing along with previously recorded music. These numbers are often outrageously dramatic, extremely sentimental, or bitingly satirical. Each one is treated as an opportunity to experiment with the meanings of gender on stage. Sometimes performers make fun of mainstream gender relations, while at other times they take the insights of the songs they sing very seriously. Drag shows are usually emceed by a drag performer, who often presents a comedy routine on topics ranging from gay sex to contemporary politics. Some clubs only hire professional performers, while others are strictly amateur.

There are many fewer drag kings then drag queens and they are far less visible. However, some lesbian clubs do sponsor drag shows that provide a forum for drag king performances. These shows often feature women dressed up in female drag as well as male drag. In other words, women dress in "campy" or exaggerated female clothes that draw attention to the ways that they must perform their femininity as they interact with other women who are dressed as men and who are drawing attention to their self-conscious decision to dress as their chosen gender.

Ultimately, drag performers explain, drag exposes the ways that everyone "performs" their gender, even when they are "wearing" the socially appropriate role. If gender can be successfully understood through sex-role behavior that is outrageous and clearly fake, then logically it follows that those traits and characteristics that we uncritically associate with one sex or the other are being put on or taken off by everyone. Rather than naturally coming out of biological sex, sex-role behavior is learned, performed, and always unreal.

Drag has become more mainstream in the last decade, both within the gay community and in American culture more generally. RuPaul was a crossover sensation in the early 1990s, and was, according to People magazine "the first drag queen ever to land on the pop charts." Her album, Supermodel of the World, brought her into the limelight in 1993 and her perfectly accessorized seven foot frame has kept her in the public eye. Like other drag performers, RuPaul often openly reflects on the meanings of drag. "Drag queens," she once explained, "are like the shamans of our society, reminding people of what's funny and what's a stereotype."

Wigstock, an annual day-long drag show held on Labor Day in New York City, is another example of the mainstreaming of drag. It has attracted thousands of spectators and hundreds of local and national performers throughout the mid to late 1990s. A number of movies have also caught the national eye. The popularity of the Australian film The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert in the United States as well as the success of To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything, Julie Newmar attest to the American cultural interest in drag and particularly drag queens in the 1990s. Both of them feature a group of drag queens travelling across their respective countries and ultimately finding themselves stranded in backward small towns. To Wong Foo, especially, captures the bland moral most commonly associated with drag queens in popular culture. By first experiencing discrimination and then "educating" the provincial residents with whom they come into contact, the three drag queens represent American cultural fantasies about victimized people. Confronting and overcoming their oppression by drawing on the drag queen "spirit," the queens of To Wong Foo tell Americans what they already think they know: that a good attitude on the part of oppressed people is the best way to overcome injustice.

While mainstream movies make these simple connections, drag queens and kings themselves discuss the disruptive potential of drag. Rather then reinforcing American's comfort with oppression and their resolve not to take responsibility for victimization, drag underlines American cultural anxieties about difference and forces men and women to think critically about how cultural ideas structure their identities and their sense of possibility.

Further Reading:

Brown, Susan, Persona. New York, Rizzoli, 1997.

Bullough, Vern L. Cross Dressing, Sex, and Gender. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993.

Chermayeff, Catherine, Jonathan David, and Nan Richardson. Drag Diaries. San Francisco, Chronicle Books, 1995.

Ekins, Richard, and Dave King, eds. Blending Genders: Social Aspects of Cross-Dressing and Sex-Changing. New York, Routledge, 1996.

Ferris, Lesley, ed. Crossing the Stage: Controversies on Cross-Dressing. New York, Routledge, 1993.

Garber, Marjorie B. Vested Interests: Cross-Dressing & Cultural Anxiety. New York, Routledge, 1992.

Pettiway, Leon E. Honey, Honey, Miss Thang: Being Black, Gay, and on the Streets. Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1996.

This is the complete article, containing 1,078 words (approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page).

Ask any question on Drag queen and get it answered FAST!
Answer questions in BookRags Q&A and earn points toward
discounted or even FREE Study Guides and other BookRags products!
Learn more about BookRags Q&A
Copyrights
Drag from St. James Encyclopedia of Popular Culture. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.

Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags

Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags