BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help


Search "seeing green"

Navigation

seeing green

Print-Friendly
By DAVE PHILIPPS THE GAZETTE
About 4 pages (1,117 words)

Colorado Springs Gazette, April 9th, 2007

 Soy, coconut, corn, sheep, bamboo, hemp. It sounds like the ingredient list at some exotic bistro. Instead it’s a recipe for sustainability that an increasing number of outdoorgear makers are cooking up to wean the industry off petroleum-based fabrics and plastics.  Corn is spun into a polyesterlike fiber for shirts and socks. Wood-chip fibers show up in yoga pants. Fast-growing bamboo is used for everything from workout T’s to inflatable sleeping pads. Wool — that old, itchy has-been from grandma’s closet — is now the go-to choice for boutique sport socks. “It’s come a long way in a short time. I just put on a shirt from ExOfficio made out of soy. It was probably the most luscious shirt I’ve ever worn,” said Michael Hodgson, editor of Gear Trends magazine. Hodgson has seen the trend explode as technology has caught up with outdoor shoppers’ desires to be friendly to Earth.
   “A decade ago, you could buy recycled fleece but you could tell it was recycled,” he said. “These days, green products feel as good, look as good, and perform as good as the others, so it’s a very easy choice.”
   But does using corn or soy really have a positive effect on the planet? It’s hard to say.
   Few companies have an objective tool for rating how good a shirt or shoe is for the environment. But that may be changing. In May, leaders in the outdoor industry will meet in Boulder to discuss developing a universal system to rate a product’s environmental impact.
   “It’s tricky to know if you’re really doing a good thing unless you have an objective way to look at the whole process,” said Betsy Blaisdell, manager of environmental stewardship at the shoe and apparel company Timberland, which recently created a rating called the Green Index. The Green Index looks at everything from materials to shipping and gives shoes a sustainability score from 1 to 10.
   “When we looked at products from start to finish, we found some surprises,” she said.
   The natural hemp that Timberland used in its Greenscape Mountain sneakers to replace a synthetic fabric turned out to be a bit limp, so designers added a stiff backing. The backing added weight. The weight burned more fossil fuels in shipping. Once a Green Index analysis was run, it showed the synthetic fiber was more sustainable. Out went the hemp.
   “I think the designers were a little mad, but it’s been a great tool,” said Blaisdell.
   Green Index tags are included with five shoe models, and the company hopes to tag all its shoes and clothing by 2009. Timberland officials will urge other manufacturers at the May meeting to develop a standardized “nutrition label” that tells how green a product is.
   In the meantime, a lack of standards isn’t stopping scores of gear makers from running with new sustainable goods.
   Osprey Packs, which makes backpacks in Cortez, has been using recycled plastic for more than a decade in its packs’ stiff frame sheets.
   “We always had the desire to do more, we just didn’t have the materials,” said Osprey spokesman Gareth Martins.
   Two years ago, Osprey designers started hunting down suppliers and refining designs to fill the void. In July, Osprey will release its ReSource series of day packs and courier bags made of 70 percent recycled materials. Osprey hopes lessons learned in the creation and use of the ReSource packs will be used in creating Osprey’s higher-end packs.
   “We’ll look at using recycling in the rest of our line, but that’s only part of our sustainability goal. There’s a larger picture, too,” Martins said.
   Osprey has scrutinized its entire operation.

It purchases wind-energy credits for its Cortez offices. It plans to add solar power and green design to its offices, and it gives employees economic incentives for biking or car pooling to work.
   “Any product is still going to have an impact, but we can try to minimize it,” said Martins. “From a planetary perspective, there’s no way around it. This is what we have to do.”
   Founder of Boulder-based Teko socks, Jim Heiden, said the raw ingredients are key to green gear. Reached on a cell phone while riding his bike, Heiden explained how his company’s socks are made from renewable corn-derived polyester or wool sheered from sheep on a single ranch in Tasmania.
   “They have unbelievable environmental practices,” he said. “No pesticides, no herbicides, and a full biodiversity plan.”
   The socks are made at a plant powered by wind.
   His one problem: The cornfiber socks are made from genetically modified kernels — a fact that caused industry giants Patagonia and Timberland to refuse to use corn.
   “It may change though,” Heiden said. “There’s a lot of pressure from companies to get the GMO” — genetically modified organism — “out of our threads.”
   Green materials cost more. A pair of socks from the wool of the Tasmania herd runs about $15. But Heiden said people are willing to pay for a sock that offers peace of mind.
   His sales have grown almost 200 percent in two years.
   “It’s the Whole Foods model,” he said, referring to the phenomenally popular, and pricey, natural-foods chain.
   Companies continue to innovate. Patagonia announced in January that it will start recycling Capilene base layers, fleece and organic cotton T-shirts. Drop off your old gear at a Patagonia store and the company will recycle it into new clothing.
   “I love the Patagonia program,” said Timberland’s Blaisdell. “I hope we move towards that — making shoes that nourish new products when they wear out, sort of a cradle-tocradle idea.”
   Cradle to cradle, is the idea, coined by authors William Mc-Donough and Michael Braungart, that companies, consumers and the environment can benefit from products designed from the beginning to be easily recyclable.
   Blaisdell says the push for a cleaner product has reached a point where it will be hard to stop.
   “We’re all in it in the first place because we’re passionate outdoor people who want to preserve our playground. We want to do the right thing, but we need a critical mass, and I think we now have that.”
CONTACT THE WRITER: 636-0223 or
   dave.philipps@gazette.com  
   CONSERVATION IN CLOTHING
1. ExOfficio Tofutech T-Shirt
Fast-drying like polyester but made from soybean plants. $34. REI
2. REI Slickrock Shorts
Organic cotton on the outside with smooth and quick-drying recycled polyester on the inside. $34. REI
3. Timberland Mountain Sneakers
The most sustainable sport shoe on the market has renewable hemp uppers with organically tanned leather, shoelaces made from recycled soda bottles and a 30 percent recycled sole. $85. REI
4. Teko Ingeo socks
High-performance running and hiking socks made from corn. $10. Mountain Chalet, 226 N. Tejon St., and tekosocks.com.

Copyrights
By DAVE PHILIPPS THE GAZETTE. seeing green. Copyright 2007  Colorado Springs Gazette.

Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags




About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy