BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help


Search "GAO: U.S. hasnt done enough to secure radioactive material overseas"

Navigation

GAO: U.S. hasn't done enough to secure radioactive material overseas

Print-Friendly
H. JOSEF HEBERT
About 2 pages (450 words)

AP Features, March 13th, 2007

The Energy Department has not done enough in Russia and in developing countries to secure radioactive material that could be used to make a so-called dirty bomb, congressional investigators said Tuesday.

A report by the Government Accountability Office said that over the past four years security has been improved at hundreds of sites containing radioactive material in 40 countries but "many of the highest-risk and most dangerous sources still remained unsecured."

The U.S. program is aimed at providing financial support and technical expertise for securing such devices.

The GAO, Congress' investigative arm, said the government has spent $108 million since 2002 on securing such material _ some of it abandoned, lost or in poorly guarded waste sites.

But there has been "limited progress securing many of the most dangerous sources," especially in Russia where radioactive material is used to power hundreds of small generators in remote sites, the report said.

"Thousands of these sources have been lost, stolen or abandoned," said the report sent to Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, who had requested the GAO review.

The radioactive materials are used in everything from medical devices and remote generators to oil drilling equipment and to power lighthouses and weather stations. The devices contain such radioactive isotopes as cobalt-60, cesium-137 and strontium-90 in encapsulated or sealed small amounts.

But if terrorists obtained a large number of these devices, they could be used to fashion a "dirty bomb" that would explode like a conventional explosive, but would scatter radioactive dust and debris.

While there is no danger of a nuclear explosion, terrorist experts have said a dirty bomb _ though not likely to cause any deaths beyond those from the conventional explosion _ could cause panic and result in an expensive cleanup.

The GAO report said the U.S. program has focused on securing material at medical facilities, but has made little progress in assuring that other, sometimes more dangerous sources are secure.

For example, the GAO said, 16 of 20 waste storage sites containing such material remained unsecured in Russia and Ukraine. It also said 700 remote transformers powered by radioactive material "remain operational and abandoned" in Russia.

Also strontium-90 in large devices such as generators that power lighthouses and weather stations in remote areas also remain relatively unsecured, the GAO said.

In the Republic of Georgia, "we found that a facility containing (remote generators) which had thousands of curies of cesium-137 had several large openings in the roof," the investigators wrote.

And in Lithuania, the investigators said they visited an oncology clinic where they observed a cable that was supposed to secure a medical machine with cobalt-60 had been broken for almost a month.

___

On the Net:

Government Accountability Office: http://www.gao.gov

Copyrights
H. JOSEF HEBERT. GAO: U.S. hasn't done enough to secure radioactive material overseas. Copyright 2007  AP Features.

Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags




About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy