We were a little skeptical when the Audi A3 2.0T arrived last summer. Why would another luxury automaker launch an entry-level hatchback when, in the past 10 years, BMW and Mercedes have proved it to be a lame-duck segment in the U.S.?
So we were surprised to find the A3 to be fantastic--even the $25,000 base model. Its virtues include a 200-hp, direct-injection turbo four, a sweet-shifting sixspeed, a terrific ride-and-handling balance, and about as much passenger and cargo space as in the larger A4. Those merits later secured it a place on our 2006 10Best Cars list, among many wellestablished players.
We also eagerly awaited the more powerful V-6 version--the A3 3.2 S-line--that wasn't available at the outset. This pumpedup A3 sports 250 horses and also comes with the excellent twin-clutch Direct Shift Gearbox (DSG) automated manual, which works just as well as a manual or automatic, and Quattro four-wheel drive.
On the downside, we also anticipated that the standard DSG and four-wheel drive would add thousands to the bottom line, but the V-6 model starts at a whopping $34,700, which is $9240 more than a base A3 2.0T. If you're not shocked, consider that a 325i-- yes, the 15-time 10Best-winning 3-series--is $3105 cheaper.
In fairness, that huge price includes much of the 2.0-liter model's optional gear--leather seats and steering wheel, uplevel stereo, aluminum trim. But the 3.2's price is still about a $4500 bump, and it seems as if a loaded $40,135 Audi should off er a power passenger seat. Our A3 did include a headroom- robbing $1100 sunroof and a $1950 navigation system, but if we were choosing, we might pop for the $800 xenon headlights, the $700 heated seats, and the $1000 18-inch summer tires.
Having choked down the bitter price pill, we found the driving experience to be top-notch. Despite being front-wheel-drive-based, the A3 resists understeer. If it starts to push, simply back off the throttle a smidge and the A3 tightens its line beautifully. The steering is predictable and has an accurate feel as you toy with the 0.81-g cornering threshold, although it gets overly light in parking lots. If that skidpad number seems a little low, it's because our A3 3.2 wore all-season tires instead of the aforementioned summer tires we would have likely preferred.
The top-level A3 still rides reasonably well, but subjectively, it seems to have lost that lighton- its-feet feel we so like. That impression was cemented at the scales: The S-line's weight has swelled almost 500 pounds over the 2.0T model's, to 3718. That`s even heavier than a BMW 5-series sedan, which is almost two feet longer.
That weight increase also explains why the performance gains weren't impressive, prompting befuddled first impressions such as, "It didn't feel as fast as I thought," or "That was the 250- horsepower version, right?" The V-6 model does shed 0.7 second off the 0-to-60-mph dash, managing it in 5.8 seconds. However, the 5-to-60 and quarter-mile times only improved by 0.4 second. And the V-6's noises aren't that invigorating, either--it's more drone than growl.
The biggest disappointment is a limp brake pedal that requires more travel than expected for an average slowdown. When hustling back roads, it'll flirt with the floor. Stopping distance is a so-so 177 feet, again courtesy of the all-season rubber.
We still can appreciate the flexible packaging of a hatchback, and the tidy A3, with its wheels pushed out to the corners, shrugs off the long-rear-overhang wagon stigma. We love the A3's clean lines, rich interior, and frisky moves. Just stick with the lighter, cheaper, and not-much-slower 2.0-liter version.
Copyrights
Dave Vanderwerp. A 10Best Winner Induces Sticker Hysteria In V-6 Form. Copyright 2006 Car and Driver.
