How effective do you believe the author is at tying together three individual stories which all have one unifying theme? Do you believe the play would have been more effective had he told only one story? Why or why not?
Do you believe the role of the interviewer is critical? Why or why not? How are the character's interactions with the interviewer different? How are they the same?
In what ways does the interviewer seem to be omnipotent? Do you believe the interviewer is a higher power? Why or why not?
How does the author use the interviewer to explore each character in a more in-depth way? What other technique could the author use to achieve the same result? Which do you believe would be more effective? Why?
In what ways are the three patients united? In what ways do their views on dying differ? Do you believe...
This section contains 640 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)