BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help


Search "Two theories of origin of the land-plant sporophyte: which is left standing?"

Navigation

Two theories of origin of the land-plant sporophyte: which is left standing?

About 41 pages (12,296 words)

The Botanical Review, April 1st, 2003

Questions concerning the two competing theories of the development of alternating generations in land plants, the homologous theory and the antithetic theory, have never been fully resolved. In the majority of recent accounts there appears to have been increasing de facto support (if one considers the ontogenetic processes and phylogenetic consequences discussed) for the antithetic theory. However, this preference is usually not plainly stated (as such) in these discussions, and some support has also continued for the homologous theory. The crux of both theories (homologous and antithetic) cen...

HighBeam Research, Free Preview: 'Two theories of origin of the land-plant sporophyte: which is left standing?'... Full Membership required for unlimited access. Free 7-day trial.

Subscribers: HighBeam content is only available to HighBeam subscribers. Click the link above for more information.

Content Partner
Blackwell, Will H.. The Botanical Review, April 1st, 2003. Two theories of origin of the land-plant sporophyte: which is left standing?. Content provided by HighBeam Research.



Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags


About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy