BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help


S & S loses challenge to 'Son of Sam' law. (Simon and Schuster; New York State law prohibiting commercial exploitation of a crime )

About 2 pages (646 words)

Publishers Weekly, October 19th, 1990

Simon & Schuster has lost its First Amendment challenge to New York State's "Son of Sam" law that prevents criminals from profiting from their crimes at the expense fo their victims.

At the press time the publisher had not yet decided whether to appeal the decision.

In the October 3 decision, two judges of a three-member panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit acknowledged that the statute--Section 632-a--could remove the incentive for criminals to tell the stories of their crimes and so deprive the public of information on social issues. But, the court said, the state ha...

HighBeam Research, Free Preview: 'S & S loses challenge to 'Son of Sam' law. (Simon and Schuster; New York State law prohibiting commercial exploitation of a crime )'... Full Membership required for unlimited access. Free 7-day trial.

Subscribers: HighBeam content is only available to HighBeam subscribers. Click the link above for more information.

Content Partner
Reuter, Madalynne. Publishers Weekly, October 19th, 1990. S & S loses challenge to 'Son of Sam' law. (Simon and Schuster; New York State law prohibiting commercial exploitation of a crime ). Content provided by HighBeam Research.



Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags


About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy