BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help


Search "Perceiving particulars blindly: remarks on a Nyaya-Buddhist controversy."

Navigation

Perceiving particulars blindly: remarks on a Nyaya-Buddhist controversy.

About 23 pages (7,011 words)

Philosophy East and West, July 1st, 2004

Introduction

The discussion by Mark Siderits in this issue--"Perceiving Particulars"--and two pieces by Monima Chadha--the first her article "Perceptual Cognition: A Nyaya-Kantian Approach" (Chadha 2001) and the second her reply to Siderits in this issue--have taught me much. (1) I have little to add beyond agreeing on the whole with Siderits and making a few tweaks concerning Nyaya. Chadha astutely captures the insight of Gangesa, the fourteenth-century Naiyayika cited by her (and by Siderits): indeterminate perception does not have a "particular as such" as its object (visaya), but only, ...

HighBeam Research, Free Preview: 'Perceiving particulars blindly: remarks on a Nyaya-Buddhist controversy.'... Full Membership required for unlimited access. Free 7-day trial.

Subscribers: HighBeam content is only available to HighBeam subscribers. Click the link above for more information.

Content Partner
Phillips, Stephen H.. Philosophy East and West, July 1st, 2004. Perceiving particulars blindly: remarks on a Nyaya-Buddhist controversy.. Content provided by HighBeam Research.



Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags


About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy