The Architects' Journal, April 5th, 2007
In trying to overturn the ARB Professional Conduct Committee's (PCC's) findings against her, Senka Vranicki's case (Judgment 16.03.07) has highlighted how the appeal system works, writes Sue Lindsey (a j plus 27. 03. 07). Vranicki was charged by the ARB with both aspects of professional misconduct set out in Section 14 of the Architects Act 1997, namely unacceptable professional conduct and serious professional incompetence. The PCC brought what they described as seven charges, each relating to a specific aspect of Vranicki's work in relation to a house extension. It made findings of serious p...
HighBeam Research, Free Preview: 'NO VINDICATION'... Full Membership required for unlimited access. Free 7-day trial.
Subscribers: HighBeam content is only available to HighBeam subscribers. Click the link above for more information.
