BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help


Kuznets's inverted-U hypothesis: comment. (comment on Rati Ram, Southern Economic Journal, p. 1112, April 1991)

About 6 pages (1,800 words)

Southern Economic Journal, January 1st, 1993

The correctness of Kuznets's inverted-U hypothesis associated with income inequality, which states that inequality would initially increase with economic development but then would fall eventually, is affirmed. This refutes Rati Ram's view as presented in 'Kuznets's Inverted-U Hypothesis: Evidence from a Highly Developed Country.' It is claimed that Ram's time-series results did not consider family composition in his use of inequality measures based on family incomes.

I. Introduction

In a recent article appearing in this journal, Ram |5~ presents evidence from the United States contradicting...

HighBeam Research, Free Preview: 'Kuznets's inverted-U hypothesis: comment. (comment on Rati Ram, Southern Economic Journal, p. 1112, April 1991)'... Full Membership required for unlimited access. Free 7-day trial.

Subscribers: HighBeam content is only available to HighBeam subscribers. Click the link above for more information.

Content Partner
Fosu, Augustin Kwasi. Southern Economic Journal, January 1st, 1993. Kuznets's inverted-U hypothesis: comment. (comment on Rati Ram, Southern Economic Journal, p. 1112, April 1991). Content provided by HighBeam Research.



Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags


About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy