BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help


Search "How Humane was the English Civil War?"

Navigation

How Humane was the English Civil War?

About 12 pages (3,619 words)

History Review, March 1st, 2001

Richard Wilkinson takes issue with the consensus view by pointing to atrocities in the civil war.

`This war was eminently humane', alleged G.M. Trevelyan in his England under the Stuarts. Trevelyan was a propagandist. He wrote from the heart as well as from the head. Expressing his Whig ideology `with tremendous gusto' (J.H. Plumb), he attributed `the moral splendour of our Great Rebellion and Civil War' to the idealism of its participants. `In England the revolutionary passions were stirred by no class in its own material interest'.(1) Because its participants fought over the issue of Brit...

HighBeam Research, Free Preview: 'How Humane was the English Civil War?'... Full Membership required for unlimited access. Free 7-day trial.

Subscribers: HighBeam content is only available to HighBeam subscribers. Click the link above for more information.

Content Partner
Wilkinson, Richard. History Review, March 1st, 2001. How Humane was the English Civil War?. Content provided by HighBeam Research.



Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags


About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy