Student Essay on Neo Nazi

Questions on this topic? Just ask!

Neo Nazi

Summary:   Essay discusses David Irving and his views on Nazi's ways.

Who is David Irving's to some this name means nothing to others, you may find him a god, or a evil man. but what is wrong with his views well youl just have to find out

Before I go into the hard facts, il just say David Irving should either be not allowed into Australia, or allowed into Australia under certain restrains, such as no mass public preaching, ect.

Now first of all Irving has said that the final solution was not a order by Hitler, but simply how can this be the case when there is a written text document stating the orders that are to be followed out, with Hitler's signature Written by none other then Hitler, hes hand writing has been confermd from other documents that also happened to be written By hitter.

t here was also a huge conference prier to the final solution involving all major generals and All high-ranking officials although these people are now dead, as most where killed at the end of the war, and others charged for war crimes and hanged, there are recorded proof of what they said before they died, that they where given the order from Hitler himself. Not from some wana-be fura, or Himilar, but from Hitler, so how could someone say that these facts are wrong, how can they say that all these recorded and written texts are wrong, what does he think, that there fake", that they have been made for the fun of it and just make a story? Well if that's what he thinks, does he also think that a countries constitution are there so that people can break them and he can just go about corrupting other people with false lies. Pity stories of what has happened in the past, and that has already been dealt with, So saying here again If this man, is to be let into australa, he is to be set under careful eye, and if he is to disturb the piece as such he is to be removed inevitably. No questions asked, No hassles. As a human he deserves a chance, and it should be given. If you don't agree, then I suggest you keep listing.

He has also claimed, that there was no gas chamber in austwich, Now. When the Russian allies moved into the camp they have found serval Dozen cromation pits, mass amounts of bodies ready to be burnt, that have no external injuries, except there dead from, whata do ya know. Gas, from Zphylon B gas, the very same gas the Germans where using in other camps nearby, The very same gas that also killed other jews ect. Nearby what is he saying, that these bodoies came form nearby camps just to be burnt, and the containters that where found are there for good looks?

I think not. Is he also saying the section of blueprints that have been found, for austtwich and the area, which may I add had a gas chamber Clearly marked on them, is he saying they where not built, but how can this be when American and birttish scouts that happen to fly above austwich before invading had photo graphed it, AND the gas chambers so recon pictures (which I have been luck enough to obtain are fake"

also when somebody dies, everyone knows, the parents know, the friends know, when a few thousand people die or go missing, people know, even with control over the media, family friends know. So if I say 70,000 people died, or even 400 people die, u can tell that people are dead even if you died your family died, your friends died, there still is a person that would know.

So what Irving Is saying, if I was to take 100 people from this school, kill em all of, and then claim I only killed 80, they going to believe me, but yet threes 20 people mysteries gone, but apparently I dint kill them 20 people disappeared around the same time of my mass murders, but yet. Will they agree when I say I dint kill them. When facts add up. You cant disagree.

also what if I was to take only 100 year sevens and not any other students, and kill only them, is this not picking out a group of people. Then claim that I only randomly picked students

So if Hitlars nazi's where only to take a large amount of jewish people, which have been accounted for, which have had friends that know there dead, and have for ever mourned over the loss of families they new, because really, Jewish or not, everybody has feelings, and if u know somebody, and they die, you know there dead. And you cannot denie it, even if you believe that there evil and they deserved to die, you still know there dead

So how could he claim, that hitlers nazi';s did not separate jewish people, or target them. If we know he did. Also beside word of mouth from teachings and text books ect, there are Pictures of these death camps or labour camps where the Jewish people have there own little area, there not in those areas to be panferd, and favoured before they die, but to be separated and abused.

So maybe its not Davids fault maybe he wasn't taught properly in history class, but taught by nazi's that lied to him then undergoing the traumas of a event that made him to stubborn to think other wise that old whacko hitlar maybie was wrong.

So in saying all this ild

say that David irvign should be allowed into Australia as a chance. And that is realy all. Just a chance