BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature
Guides
Criticism & Essays Criticism &
Essays
Questions & Answers Questions &
Answers
Lesson Plans Lesson
Plans
My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help


The Spectator, Volume 1 eBook

Print-Friendly  Order the PDF version  Order the RTF version
Joseph Addison

L.

[Footnote 1:  Essay ‘On the Danger of Procrastination:’ 

  ‘There’s no fooling with Life when it is once turn’d beyond Forty.’]

* * * * *

No. 124.  Monday, July 23, 1711.  Addison.

 [Greek (transliterated):  Mega Biblion, mega kakon.]

A Man who publishes his Works in a Volume, has an infinite Advantage over one who communicates his Writings to the World in loose Tracts and single Pieces.  We do not expect to meet with any thing in a bulky Volume, till after some heavy Preamble, and several Words of Course, to prepare the Reader for what follows:  Nay, Authors have established it as a kind of Rule, that a Man ought to be dull sometimes; as the most severe Reader makes Allowances for many Rests and Nodding-places in a Voluminous Writer.  This gave Occasion to the famous Greek Proverb which I have chosen for my Motto, That a great Book is a great Evil.

On the contrary, those who publish their Thoughts in distinct Sheets, and as it were by Piece-meal, have none of these Advantages.  We must immediately fall into our Subject, and treat every Part of it in a lively Manner, or our Papers are thrown by as dull and insipid:  Our Matter must lie close together, and either be wholly new in itself, or in the Turn it receives from our Expressions.  Were the Books of our best Authors thus to be retailed to the Publick, and every Page submitted to the Taste of forty or fifty thousand Readers, I am afraid we should complain of many flat Expressions, trivial Observations, beaten Topicks, and common Thoughts, which go off very well in the Lump.  At the same Time, notwithstanding some Papers may be made up of broken Hints and irregular Sketches, it is often expected that every Sheet should be a kind of Treatise, and make out in Thought what it wants in Bulk:  That a Point of Humour should be worked up in all its Parts; and a Subject touched upon in its most essential Articles, without the Repetitions, Tautologies and Enlargements, that are indulged to longer Labours.  The ordinary Writers of Morality prescribe to their Readers after the Galenick way; their Medicines are made up in large Quantities.  An Essay-Writer must practise in the Chymical Method, and give the Virtue of a full Draught in a few Drops.  Were all Books reduced thus to their Quintessence, many a bulky Author would make his Appearance in a Penny-Paper:  There would be scarce such a thing in Nature as a Folio.  The Works of an Age would be contained on a few Shelves; not to mention millions of Volumes that would be utterly annihilated.

Ask any question on The Spectator and get it answered FAST!
Answer questions in BookRags Q&A and earn points toward
discounted or even FREE Study Guides and other BookRags products!
Learn more about BookRags Q&A
Copyrights
The Spectator, Volume 1 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.

Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags




About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy