BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature Guides Criticism/Essays Criticism/Essays Biographies Biographies My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help

Jump to Page: / 170 

Search "The Dancing Mouse"

Navigation
 

The Dancing Mouse eBook

Print-Friendly  Order the PDF version  Order the RTF version
Robert M. Yerkes

The striking results of this investigation of re-learning are exhibited in the curves of learning and re-learning of Figure 32.  These curves make it appear that the mice re-acquired the white-black discrimination habit much more readily than they had originally acquired it.  But in addition to furnishing the basis for some such statement as the foregoing, the curves suggest a serious criticism of the experiment.

In the original tests, the preliminary series indicated a strong preference for black.  In series A it was chosen on the average 5.8 times in 10, and in series B, 5.7 times.  This preference was rapidly overcome by the training series, and at the end of 130 tests discrimination was perfect.  All this appears in the curve of learning (solid line of figure).  On the other hand, these preliminary series when repeated as memory tests, after a rest-interval of eight weeks, gave markedly different results.  Series A indicated preference for white (5.6 times in 10) instead of black, and series B indicated only a slight preference for black.  In brief, series A and B show that the preference for black was considerably stronger at the beginning of the training than at the beginning of the re-training.

In the light of these facts it is fair to claim that the effects of the white-black training had not wholly disappeared as the result of eight weeks of rest, and that the experiment therefore fails to furnish satisfactory grounds for the statement that re-learning occurs more rapidly than learning.  I accept this criticism as pertinent, although not necessarily valid, and at the same time I freely admit that the results have a significance which I had not anticipated.  But they are not less interesting or valuable on that account.  Granting, then, that at least some of the ten individuals which took part in the experiment had not completely lost the memory of their white-black training at the end of eight weeks, it is still possible that an examination of the individual results may justify some conclusion concerning the question which was proposed at the outset of the investigation.  Such an examination is made possible by Tables 49 and 50, in which I have arranged separately the results for the males and the females.

TABLE 49

WHITE-BLACK TRAINING.  TEN TESTS PER DAY

Males
TRAINING                    RETRAINING
210 220 230 410 420  AV.     210 220 230 410 420  AV.
A        6   5   6   6   6   5.8      5   4   5   4   3   4.2
B        6   8   8   5   1   5.6      8   4   5   4   6   5.4
1        6   7   6   2   4   5.0      3   3   4   7   3   4.0
2        4   3   1   2   3   2.6      2   4   2   5   3   3.2
3        3   1   4   3   4   3.0      1   4   1   4   1   2.2
4        5   0   3   3   2   2.6      0   1   0   1   2   0.8
5        3   0   4   1   4   2.4      0   2   0   2   0   0.8


Copyrights
The Dancing Mouse from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.

Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags


About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy