To this evidence of a lack of an imitative tendency
in the dancer I may here add the results of my observations
in other experiments. In the discrimination tests
and in the labyrinth tests I purposely so arranged
conditions, in certain instances, that one individual
should have an opportunity to imitate another.
In no case did this occur. Seldom indeed did
the animals so much as follow one another with any
considerable degree of persistence. They did
not profit by one another’s acts.
Excellent evidence in support of this conclusion was
furnished by the behavior of the mice in the discrimination
experiments. Some individuals learned to pull
as well as to push the swinging wire doors of the
apparatus and were thus enabled to pass through the
doorways in either direction; other individuals learned
only to pass through in the direction in which the
doors could be pushed open. Naturally I was interested
to discover whether those which knew only the trick
of opening the doors by pushing would learn to pull
the doors or would be stimulated to try by seeing
other individuals do so. At first I arranged special
tests of imitation in the discrimination box; later
I observed the influence of the behavior of one mouse
upon that of its companion in connection with visual
discrimination experiments. This was made possible
by the fact that usually a pair of individuals was
placed in the discrimination box and the tests given
alternately to the male and to the female. Both
individuals had the freedom of the nest-box and each
frequently saw the other pass through the doorway
between the nest-box, A, and the entrance chamber,
B (Figure 14), either from A to B
by pushing the swing door or from B to A
by pulling the door.
Although abundant opportunity for imitation in connection
with the opening of the doors in the discrimination
box was given to twenty-five individuals, I obtained
no evidence of ability to learn by imitation.
The dancers did not watch the acts which were performed
by their companions, and in most instances they did
not attempt to follow a mate from nest-box to entrance
chamber.
These problem tests, simple as they are, have revealed
two important facts concerning the educability of
the dancer. First, that it does not learn by
imitation to any considerable extent, and, second,
that it is aided by being put through an act.
Our general conclusion from the results of the experiments
which have been described in this chapter, if any general
conclusion is to be drawn thus prematurely, must be
that the dancing mouse in its methods of learning
differs markedly from other mice and from rats.
CHAPTER XIII
HABIT FORMATION: THE LABYRINTH HABIT
The problem method, of which the ladder and door-opening
tests of the preceding chapter are examples, has yielded
interesting results concerning the individual initiative,
ingenuity, motor ability, and ways of learning of
the dancer; but it has not furnished us with accurate
measurements of the rapidity of learning or of the
permanency of the effects of training. In this
chapter I shall therefore present the results of labyrinth
experiments which were planned as means of measuring
the intelligence of the dancer.
Copyrights
The Dancing Mouse from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.