Gillies), (Bohn’s Classical Library), 1848,
J E. C. Welldon, 1883, B Jowett, 1885, with Introduction
and Index by H W C Davis, 1905, Books i iii iv (vii)
from Bekker’s text by W E Bolland, with Introduction
by A Lang, 1877. Problemata (with writings of
other philosophers), 1597, 1607, 1680, 1684, etc.
Rhetorica, A summary by T Hobbes, 1655 (?), new edition,
1759, by the translators of the Art of Thinking, 1686,
1816, by D M Crimmin, 1812, J Gillies, 1823, Anon
1847, J E C Welldon, 1886, R C Jebb, with Introduction
and Supplementary Notes by J E Sandys, 1909 (see under
Poetica and Ethica). Secreta Secretorum (supposititious
work), Anon 1702, from the Hebrew version by M Gaster,
1907, 1908. Version by Lydgate and Burgh, edited
by R Steele (E E T S), 1894, 1898.
LIFE, ETC J W Blakesley, 1839, A Crichton (Jardine’s
Naturalist’s Library), 1843, JS Blackie, Four
Phases of Morals, Socrates, Aristotle, etc, 1871,
G Grote, Aristotle, edited by A Bain and G C Robertson,
1872, 1880, E Wallace, Outlines of the Philosophy
of Aristotle, 1875, 1880, A Grant (Ancient Classics
for English readers), 1877, T Davidson, Aristotle
and Ancient Educational Ideals (Great Educators), 1892,
F Sewall, Swedenborg and Aristotle, 1895, W A Heidel,
The Necessary and the Contingent of the Aristotelian
System (University of Chicago Contributions to Philosophy),
1896, F W Bain, On the Realisation of the Possible,
and the Spirit of Aristotle, 1899, J H Hyslop, The
Ethics of the Greek Philosophers, etc (Evolution of
Ethics), 1903, M V Williams, Six Essays on the Platonic
Theory of Knowledge as expounded in the later dialogues
and reviewed by Aristotle, 1908, J M Watson, Aristotle’s
Criticism of Plato, 1909 A E Taylor, Aristotle, 1919,
W D Ross, Aristotle, 1923.
ARISTOTLE’S ETHICS
BOOK I
Every art, and every science reduced to a teachable
form, and in like manner every action and moral choice,
aims, it is thought, at some good: for which
reason a common and by no means a bad description of
the Chief Good is, “that which all things aim
at.”
Now there plainly is a difference in the Ends proposed:
for in some cases they are acts of working, and in
others certain works or tangible results beyond and
beside the acts of working: and where there are
certain Ends beyond and beside the actions, the works
are in their nature better than the acts of working.
Again, since actions and arts and sciences are many,
the Ends likewise come to be many: of the healing
art, for instance, health; of the ship-building art,
a vessel; of the military art, victory; and of domestic
management, wealth; are respectively the Ends.
And whatever of such actions, arts, or sciences range
under some one faculty (as under that of horsemanship
the art of making bridles, and all that are connected
with the manufacture of horse-furniture in general;
this itself again, and every action connected with
war, under the military art; and in the same way others
under others), in all such, the Ends of the master-arts
are more choice-worthy than those ranging under them,
because it is with a view to the former that the latter
are pursued.