“So surely it must be with grief: how different
the terrible agony for a beloved one just gone from
earth, to the soft regret for one who disappeared
into Heaven years ago! So with the art of poetry:
how imperatively, when it deals with the great emotions
of tragedy, it must remove the actors from us, in
proportion as the emotions are to elevate, and the
tragedy is to please us by the tears it draws!
Imagine our shock if a poet were to place on the stage
some wise gentleman with whom we dined yesterday,
and who was discovered to have killed his father and
married his mother. But when Oedipus commits
those unhappy mistakes nobody is shocked. Oxford
in the nineteenth century is a long way off from Thebes
three thousand or four thousand years ago.
“And,” continued Kenelm, plunging deeper
into the maze of metaphysical criticism, “even
where the poet deals with persons and things close
upon our daily sight,—if he would give them
poetic charm he must resort to a sort of moral or
psychological distance; the nearer they are to us
in external circumstance, the farther they must be
in some internal peculiarities. Werter and Clarissa
Harlowe are described as contemporaries of their artistic
creation, and with the minutest details of apparent
realism; yet they are at once removed from our daily
lives by their idiosyncrasies and their fates.
We know that while Werter and Clarissa are so near
to us in much that we sympathize with them as friends
and kinsfolk, they are yet as much remote from us
in the poetic and idealized side of their natures as
if they belonged to the age of Homer; and this it
is that invests with charm the very pain which their
fate inflicts on us. Thus, I suppose, it must
be in love. If the love we feel is to have the
glamour of poetry, it must be love for some one morally
at a distance from our ordinary habitual selves; in
short, differing from us in attributes which, however
near we draw to the possessor, we can never approach,
never blend, in attributes of our own; so that there
is something in the loved one that always remains
an ideal,—a mystery,—’a
sun-bright summit mingling with the sky’!”
Herewith the soliloquist’s musings glided vaguely
into mere revery. He closed his eyes drowsily,
not asleep, nor yet quite awake; as sometimes in bright
summer days when we recline on the grass we do close
our eyes, and yet dimly recognize a golden light bathing
the drowsy lids; and athwart that light images come
and go like dreams, though we know that we are not
dreaming.
CHAPTER V.
FROM this state, half comatose, half unconscious,
Kenelm was roused slowly, reluctantly. Something
struck softly on his cheek,—again a little
less softly; he opened his eyes, they fell first upon
two tiny rosebuds, which, on striking his face, had
fallen on his breast; and then looking up, he saw
before him, in an opening of the trellised circle,
a female child’s laughing face. Her hand
was still uplifted charged with another rosebud, but
behind the child’s figure, looking over her
shoulder and holding back the menacing arm, was a face
as innocent but lovelier far,—the face
of a girl in her first youth, framed round with the
blossoms that festooned the trellise. How the
face became the flowers! It seemed the fairy spirit
of them.
Copyrights
Kenelm Chillingly — Complete from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.