There were not many people in St. Peter’s that
afternoon, so that I could give undisturbed attention
to the workman repairing the pavement at one point
and grinding the marble smooth with a slow, secular
movement, as if he were part of its age-Ions:
waste and repair. Another day, the last day I
came, there were companies of the personally conducted,
following their leaders about and listening to the
lectures in several languages, which no more stirred
the immense tranquillity than they themselves qualified
the spacious vacancy of the temple: you were
vaguely sensible of the one and of the other like things
heard and seen in a drowse. It was a pleasant
vagueness in which all angularities of feeling were
lost, and you were disposed to a tolerance of the things
that had hurt or offended you before. As a contemporary
of the edifice, throughout its growth, you could account
for them more and more as of their periods. Perhaps
through your genial reconciliation there came, however
dimly, a suggestion of something unnatural and alien
in your presence there as a mere sightseer, or, at
best, a connoisseur much or little instructed.
If you had been there, say, as a worshipper, would
you have been afflicted by the incongruities of the
sculptures or by the whole baroque keeping? Possibly
this consideration made you go away much modester
than you came. “After all,” you may
have said, “it is not a gallery; it is not a
museum. It is a house of prayer,” and you
emerged, let us hope, humbled, and in so far fitted
for renewed joy in the beauty, the glory of the sublime
colonnades.
VII
CHANCES IN CHURCHES
If any one were to ask me which was the most beautiful
church in Rome I should temporize, and perhaps I should
end by saying that there was none. Ecclesiastical
Rome seems to have inherited the instinct of imperial
Rome for ugliness; only, where imperial Rome used the
instinct collectively, ecclesiastical Rome has used
it distributively in the innumerable churches, each
less lovely than the other. This position will
do to hedge from; it is a bold outpost from which I
may be driven in, especially by travellers who have
seen the churches I did not see. I took my chances,
they theirs; for nobody can singly see all the churches
in Rome; that would need a syndicate.
If imperial Rome was beautiful in detail because it
had the Greeks to imagine the things it so hideously
grouped, ecclesiastical Rome may be unbeautiful in
detail because it had not the Goths to realize the
beauty of its religious aspiration—that
is, if it was the Goths who invented Gothic architecture;
I do not suppose it was. Anyway, there is said
to be but one Gothic church in Rome, and this I did
not visit, perhaps because I felt that I must inure
myself to the prevalent baroque, or perhaps from mere
perversity. I can merely say in self-defence that,
on the outside, Santa Maria sopra Minerva no more
Copyrights
Roman Holidays, and Others from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.