[18] The names and history of the Pyrenean Cagots
are equally obscure. Some have supposed that,
during the period of the Gothic warfare with the Moors,
the Cagots were a Christian tribe that betrayed the
Christian cause and interests at a critical moment.
But all is conjecture. As to the name, Southey
has somewhere offered a possible interpretation of
it; but it struck me as far from felicitous, and not
what might have been expected from Southey, whose
vast historical research and commanding talent should
naturally have unlocked this most mysterious of modern
secrets, if any unlocking does yet lie within the resources
of human skill and combining power, now that so many
ages divide us from the original steps of the case.
I may here mention, as a fact accidentally made known
to myself, and apparently not known to Southey, that
the Cagots, under a name very slightly altered, are
found in France also, as well as Spain, and in provinces
of France that have no connection at all with Spain.
[19] “Strulbrugs.”—Hardly
strulbrugs, will be the thought of the learned
reader, who knows that young women could not
be strulbrugs; since the true strulbrug was one who,
from base fear of dying, had lingered on into an old
age, omnivorous of every genial or vital impulse.
The strulbrug of Swift (and Swift, being his horrid
creator, ought to understand his own horrid creation)
was a wreck, a shell, that had been burned hollow,
and cancered by the fierce furnace of life. His
clockwork was gone, or carious; only some miserable
fragment of a pendulum continued to oscillate paralytically
from mere incapacity of any thing so abrupt, and therefore
so vigorous, as a decided HALT! However, the use
of this dreadful word may be reasonably extended to
the young who happen to have become essentially old
in misery. Intensity of a suffering existence
may compensate the want of extension; and a boundless
depth of misery may be a transformed expression for
a boundless duration of misery. The most aged
person, to all appearance, that ever came under my
eyes, was an infant—hardly eight months
old. He was the illegitimate son of a poor idiot
girl, who had herself been shamefully ill treated;
and the poor infant, falling under the care of an
enraged grandmother, who felt herself at once burdened
and disgraced, was certainly not better treated.
He was dying, when I saw him, of a lingering malady,
with features expressive of frantic misery; and it
seemed to me that he looked at the least three centuries
old. One might have fancied him one of Swift’s
strulbrugs, that, through long attenuation and decay,
had dwindled back into infancy, with one organ only
left perfect—the organ of fear and misery.
[20] This was a manoeuvre regularly taught to the
Austrian cavalry in the middle of the last century;
as a ready way of opening the doors of cottages.
CHAPTER III.
INFANT LITERATURE.
Copyrights
Autobiographical Sketches from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.