BookRags.com Literature Guides Literature Guides Criticism/Essays Criticism/Essays Biographies Biographies My Bibliography Periodic Table U.S. Presidents Shakespeare Sonnet Shake-Up
Research Anything:        
History | Encyclopedias | Films | News | Create a Bibliography | More... Login | Register | Help

Jump to Page: / 189 

Search "What Is Man? and Other Essays"

Navigation

What Is Man? and Other Essays eBook

Print-Friendly  Order the PDF version  Order the RTF version
Mark Twain

This testimony is so strong, so direct, so authoritative; and so uncheapened, unwatered by guesses, and surmises, and maybe-so’s, and might-have-beens, and could-have-beens, and must-have-beens, and the rest of that ton of plaster of Paris out of which the biographers have built the colossal brontosaur which goes by the Stratford actor’s name, that it quite convinces me that the man who wrote Shakespeare’s Works knew all about law and lawyers.  Also, that that man could not have been the Stratford Shakespeare—­and wasn’t.

Who did write these Works, then?

I wish I knew.

----- 1.   From Chapter XIII of the Shakespeare problem restated. By
George G. Greenwood, M.P.   John Lane Company, publishers.

IX

Did Francis Bacon write Shakespeare’s Works?  Nobody knows.

We cannot say we know a thing when that thing has not been proved.  Know is too strong a word to use when the evidence is not final and absolutely conclusive.  We can infer, if we want to, like those slaves. . . .  No, I will not write that word, it is not kind, it is not courteous.  The upholders of the Stratford-Shakespeare superstition call us the hardest names they can think of, and they keep doing it all the time; very well, if they like to descend to that level, let them do it, but I will not so undignify myself as to follow them.  I cannot call them harsh names; the most I can do is to indicate them by terms reflecting my disapproval; and this without malice, without venom.

To resume.  What I was about to say was, those thugs have built their entire superstition upon inferences, not upon known and established facts.  It is a weak method, and poor, and I am glad to be able to say our side never resorts to it while there is anything else to resort to.

But when we must, we must; and we have now arrived at a place of that sort. . . .  Since the Stratford Shakespeare couldn’t have written the Works, we infer that somebody did.  Who was it, then?  This requires some more inferring.

Ordinarily when an unsigned poem sweeps across the continent like a tidal wave whose roar and boom and thunder are made up of admiration, delight, and applause, a dozen obscure people rise up and claim the authorship.  Why a dozen, instead of only one or two?  One reason is, because there are a dozen that are recognizably competent to do that poem.  Do you remember “Beautiful Snow”?  Do you remember “Rock Me to Sleep, Mother, Rock Me to Sleep”?  Do you remember “Backward, turn, backward, O Time, in thy flight!  Make me a child again just for tonight”?  I remember them very well.  Their authorship was claimed by most of the grown-up people who were alive at the time, and every claimant had one plausible argument in his favor, at least—­to wit, he could have done the authoring; he was competent.

Copyrights
What Is Man? and Other Essays from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.

Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags


About BookRags | Customer Service | Report an Error | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy