Yet he made me put away my pen; he would not let me
write the history of Satan. Why? Because,
as he said, he had suspicions—suspicions
that my attitude in the matter was not reverent, and
that a person must be reverent when writing about
the sacred characters. He said any one who spoke
flippantly of Satan would be frowned upon by the religious
world and also be brought to account.
I assured him, in earnest and sincere words, that
he had wholly misconceived my attitude; that I had
the highest respect for Satan, and that my reverence
for him equaled, and possibly even exceeded, that of
any member of the church. I said it wounded me
deeply to perceive by his words that he thought I
would make fun of Satan, and deride him, laugh at
him, scoff at him; whereas in truth I had never thought
of such a thing, but had only a warm desire to make
fun of those others and laugh at them. “What
others?” “Why, the Supposers, the Perhapsers,
the Might-Have-Beeners, the Could-Have-Beeners, the
Must-Have-Beeners, the Without-a-Shadow-of-Doubters,
the We-Are-Warranted-in-Believingers, and all that
funny crop of solemn architects who have taken a good
solid foundation of five indisputable and unimportant
facts and built upon it a Conjectural Satan thirty
miles high.”
What did Mr. Barclay do then? Was he disarmed?
Was he silenced? No. He was shocked.
He was so shocked that he visibly shuddered.
He said the Satanic Traditioners and Perhapsers and
Conjecturers were themselves sacred! As
sacred as their work. So sacred that whoso ventured
to mock them or make fun of their work, could not
afterward enter any respectable house, even by the
back door.
How true were his words, and how wise! How fortunate
it would have been for me if I had heeded them.
But I was young, I was but seven years of age, and
vain, foolish, and anxious to attract attention.
I wrote the biography, and have never been in a respectable
house since.
III
How curious and interesting is the parallel—as
far as poverty of biographical details is concerned—between
Satan and Shakespeare. It is wonderful, it is
unique, it stands quite alone, there is nothing resembling
it in history, nothing resembling it in romance, nothing
approaching it even in tradition. How sublime
is their position, and how over-topping, how sky-reaching,
how supreme—the two Great Unknowns, the
two Illustrious Conjecturabilities! They are
the best-known unknown persons that have ever drawn
breath upon the planet.
For the instruction of the ignorant I will make a
list, now, of those details of Shakespeare’s
history which are facts—verified facts,
established facts, undisputed facts.
Facts
He was born on the 23d of April, 1564.
Of good farmer-class parents who could not read, could
not write, could not sign their names.
Copyrights
What Is Man? and Other Essays from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.